Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 17;14(1):e0210796.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210796. eCollection 2019.

The pro-tumor effect of CD200 expression is not mimicked by agonistic CD200R antibodies

Affiliations

The pro-tumor effect of CD200 expression is not mimicked by agonistic CD200R antibodies

Zofia Pilch et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Tumor-infiltrating immune cells can impact tumor growth and progression. The inhibitory CD200 receptor (CD200R) suppresses the activation of myeloid cells and lack of this pathway results in a reduction of tumor growth, conversely a tumorigenic effect of CD200R triggering was also described. Here we investigated the role of CD200R activation in syngeneic mouse tumor models. We showed that agonistic CD200R antibody reached tumors, but had no significant impact on tumor growth and minor effect on infiltration of immune myeloid cells. These effects were reproduced using two different anti-CD200R clones. In contrast, we showed that CD200-deficiency did decrease melanoma tumor burden. The presence of either endogenous or tumor-expressed CD200 restored the growth of metastatic melanoma foci. On the basis of these findings, we conclude that blockade of the endogenous ligand CD200 prevented the tumorigenic effect of CD200R-expressing myeloid cells in the tumor microenvironment, whereas agonistic anti-CD200R has no effect on tumor development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Involvement of one of the Bioceros BV does not alter authors’ adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Impact of anti-CD200R antibodies (clone OX110) on the growth of EMT6 tumors.
(A) EMT6 tumor growth measured as a tumor volume. (B) Example of the gating strategy in flow cytometric analysis of the intratumoral immune cells. (C) Percentage of intratumoral myeloid cells (CD11b+) without neutrophils (Ly6G+). (D) Expression of CD200R in intratumoral immune cells. (E) Percentage of splenic myeloid cells from mice with EMT6 tumors, gating as in the tumors. (F) Expression of CD200R in splenic immune cells. Mice were treated with control or anti-CD200R antibodies (clone OX110). N = 7–8 / group, data are presented as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Impact of anti-CD200R antibodies (clone OX131) on the growth of EMT6 tumors.
(A) EMT6 tumor growth measured as a tumor volume. (B) Percentage of intratumoral myeloid cells (in immune gate CD45+). (C) Percentage of intratumoral myeloid cells—subpopulations in CD11b+ cells. (D) Percentage of intratumoral CD8+ T lymphocytes. Expression of IFN-γ and TNF-α in the intratumoral CD8+ T lymphocytes (E) (F) respectively. Mice were treated with control or anti-CD200R (clone OX131). N = 7–10 / group, data are presented as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Impact of anti-CD200R antibodies on the growth of LLC and B16F10 tumors.
(A) Tumor growth depicted as tumor surface of LLC, N = 5 / group. (B) Tumor burden quantified as luminescence of the luciferase expressed by tumor cells in lungs (B16F10), N = 10 / group. (C) Percentage of intratumoral myeloid cells (CD11b+) in LLC. (D) Percentage of myeloid cells in lungs with B16F10 tumor foci. (E) Expression of CD200R in intratumoral immune cells of LLC tumors. Mice were treated with control or anti-CD200R (clone OX110). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Impact of CD200-CD200R signaling on the growth of subcutaneous B16F10 melanoma.
(A) Tumor (B16F10) growth expressed as a tumor surface measured by caliper in Cd200-/- and control (WT) mice inoculated subcutaneously, N = 5–8 / group. (B) Bioluminescence intensity from each of the tumors shown in (A) on day 18 after tumor cells inoculation. (C) Total body bioluminescence of mice inoculated intravenously with B16F10 cells. (D) Bioluminescence from chest areas of mice shown in (C) on day 20 after tumor cells inoculation, N = 6–10 / group. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, significance was calculated with t-test (A,B) or Mann-Whitney test (D) *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vaine CA, Soberman RJ. The CD200-CD200R1 inhibitory signaling pathway: immune regulation and host-pathogen interactions. Adv Immunol. 2014;121: 191–211. 10.1016/B978-0-12-800100-4.00005-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hoek RM, Ruuls SR, Murphy CA, Wright GJ, Goddard R, Zurawski SM, et al. Down-regulation of the macrophage lineage through interaction with OX2 (CD200). Science. 2000;290: 1768–1771. - PubMed
    1. Snelgrove RJ, Goulding J, Didierlaurent AM, Lyonga D, Vekaria S, Edwards L, et al. A critical function for CD200 in lung immune homeostasis and the severity of influenza infection. Nat Immunol. 2008;9: 1074–1083. 10.1038/ni.1637 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rygiel TP, Meyaard L. CD200R signaling in tumor tolerance and inflammation: A tricky balance. Curr Opin Immunol. 2012;24: 233–238. 10.1016/j.coi.2012.01.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mukhopadhyay S, Plüddemann A, Hoe JC, Williams KJ, Varin A, Makepeace K, et al. Immune Inhibitory Ligand CD200 Induction by TLRs and NLRs Limits Macrophage Activation to Protect the Host from Meningococcal Septicemia. Cell Host & Microbe. 2010;8: 236–247. 10.1016/j.chom.2010.08.005 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms