Intensification patterns and the probability of HbA1c goal attainment in Type 2 diabetes mellitus: real-world evidence for the concept of 'intensification inertia'
- PMID: 30653705
- DOI: 10.1111/dme.13900
Intensification patterns and the probability of HbA1c goal attainment in Type 2 diabetes mellitus: real-world evidence for the concept of 'intensification inertia'
Abstract
Aims: To assess the effects of 'clinical' and 'intensification inertia' by evaluating the impact of different intensification interventions on the probability of HbA1c goal attainment using real-world data.
Methods: Electronic health records (Cleveland Clinic, 2005-2016) were used to identify 7389 people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus and HbA1c ≥53 mmol/mol (≥7.0%), despite a stable regimen of two oral antihyperglycaemic drugs for ≥6 months. The participants were stratified by index HbA1c and analysed over a 6-month period for pharmacological intensification, and then for 12 additional months for HbA1c goal attainment (<53 mmol/mol).
Results: The probability of HbA1c goal attainment (Kaplan-Meier analysis) in the group with index HbA1c 53-63 mmol/mol (7.0-7.9%) was highest with the addition of oral antidiabetic drugs [57.3% (95% CI 52.1, 62.0)] or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists [56.7% (95% CI 40.4, 68.6)], in the 64-74 mmol/mol (8.0-8.9%) group with the addition of oral antidiabetic drugs [31.9% (95% CI 25.1, 38.1)] or insulin [30.6% (95% CI 18.3, 41.0)], and in the ≥75 mmol/mol (≥9.0%) group with the addition of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists [53.0% (95% CI 31.8, 67.6)] or insulin [43.5% (95% CI 36.4, 49.8)].
Conclusions: Numerical, but not statistically significant, differences in HbA1c goal attainment probability by type of intensification were most marked in people with the highest index HbA1c [≥75 mmol/mol (≥9.0%)]; in this group, injectable therapy showed trends toward greater glycaemic control benefits. Additional research into the phenomenon of intensification inertia is warranted.
© 2019 Diabetes UK.
References
-
- Stark Casagrande S, Fradkin JE, Saydah SH, Rust KF, Cowie CC. The prevalence of meeting A1C, blood pressure, and LDL goals among people with diabetes, 1988-2010. Diabetes Care 2013; 36: 2271-2279.
-
- American Diabetes Association. 8. Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care 2018; 41(Suppl. 1): S73-S85.
-
- Garber AJ, Abrahamson MJ, Barzilay JI, Blonde L, Bloomgarden ZT, Bush MA et al. Consensus statement by the American association of clinical endocrinologists and American college of endocrinology on the comprehensive type 2 diabetes management algorithm - 2017 executive summary. Endocr Pract 2017; 23: 207-238.
-
- Nichols GA, Koo YH, Shah SN. Delay of insulin addition to oral combination therapy despite inadequate glycemic control: Delay of insulin therapy. J Gen Intern Med 2007; 22: 453-458.
-
- Fu AZ, Qiu Y, Davies MJ, Radican L, Engel SS. Treatment intensification in patients with type 2 diabetes who failed metformin monotherapy. Diabetes Obes Metab 2011; 13: 765-769.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
