In vitro activity of tedizolid and other comparator drugs in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in skin and soft tissue infections in seven Colombian hospitals
- PMID: 30653864
- DOI: 10.7705/biomedica.v38i4.4022
In vitro activity of tedizolid and other comparator drugs in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in skin and soft tissue infections in seven Colombian hospitals
Abstract
Introduction: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) causes severe skin and soft tissue infections in hospitals and, more recently, in the community. Tedizolid is a new second-generation oxazolidinone derivative having greater in vitro potency than linezolid against this type of microorganism. Objectives: To evaluate the antimicrobial activity of tedizolid and other comparator antibiotics in MRSA isolates causing skin and soft tissue infections in Colombian hospitals. Materials and methods: We conducted a prospective, multi-center descriptive study in seven tertiary-level hospitals in Colombia along a 12-month period. MRSA isolates were collected from adult patients with skin and soft tissue infections. Tedizolid, linezolid, vancomycin, daptomycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and clindamycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined by ETEST® (bioMérieux). Results: MRSA isolates were obtained from 102 patients with an average age of 46.8 years of whom 56 (54.9%) were men. Infection was community-acquired in 77 cases (75.4%). Abscess-related samples predominated (69 patients: 67.6%). All isolates were susceptible to tedizolid, linezolid, daptomycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and vancomycin. Tedizolid had greater in vitro activity than linezolid. Tedizolid MIC intervals ranged from 0.125 μg/mL to 0.5 μg/mL while those of linezolid ranged from 1μg/mL to 2μg/mL. Conclusions: MRSA strains circulating in Colombia are highly susceptible to tedizolid and can be considered a therapeutic alternative for hospitals and/or community-acquired skin and soft tissue infections.
Introducción. Staphylococcus aureus resistente a meticilina (SARM) causa infecciones graves de la piel y los tejidos blandos en los hospitales y, en los últimos años, en la comunidad. El tedizolid es una nueva oxazolidinona cuya potencia in vitro ha demostrado ser mayor que la del linezolid frente a este microorganismo.Objetivo. Conocer la actividad antimicrobiana del tedizolid y de algunos antibióticos de comparación en aislamientos de SARM causante de infecciones de piel y tejidos blandos en hospitales de Colombia.Materiales y métodos. Se hizo un estudio multicéntrico prospectivo y descriptivo a lo largo de doce meses en siete hospitales de tercer nivel de Colombia. Se recolectaron aislamientos de SARM de pacientes adultos con infección de piel y tejidos blandos. Se determinó la concentración inhibitoria mínima (CIM) mediante la técnica de ETEST® (bioMérieux) del tedizolid, el linezolid, la vancomicina, la daptomicina, el trimetoprim-sulfametoxazol y la clindamicina.Resultados. Se obtuvieron aislamientos de SARM de 102 pacientes, de los cuales 56 (54,9 %) eran hombres; el promedio de edad fue de 46,8 años. La infección tuvo origen en la comunidad en 77 casos (75,4 %). El tipo de muestra que predominó fue el absceso (69 pacientes: 67,6 %). Todos los aislamientos fueron sensibles a tedizolid, linezolid, daptomicina, trimetoprim-sulfametoxazol y vancomicina. La actividad in vitro del tedizolid fue mayor que la del linezolid. Los intervalos de la CIM del tedizolid oscilaron entre 0,125 μg/ml y 0,5 μg/ml en tanto que los del linezolid fluctuaron entre 1 μg/m y 2 μg/ml.Conclusiones. Las cepas circulantes de SARM en Colombia presentaron una gran sensibilidad al tedizolid, por lo cual sería una alternativa terapéutica para las infecciones de piel y tejidos blandos en nuestro medio.
Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus resistente a meticilina; infecciones de los tejidos blandos, Colombia; oxazolidinonas.
Similar articles
-
In vitro susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from skin and soft tissue infections to vancomycin, daptomycin, linezolid and tedizolid.Braz J Infect Dis. 2017 Sep-Oct;21(5):493-499. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2017.03.010. Epub 2017 Apr 19. Braz J Infect Dis. 2017. PMID: 28432878 Free PMC article.
-
An in vitro evaluation of the efficacy of tedizolid: implications for the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections.Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018 May;91(1):93-97. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.01.006. Epub 2018 Jan 10. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018. PMID: 29452993
-
In vitro activity and microbiological efficacy of tedizolid (TR-700) against Gram-positive clinical isolates from a phase 2 study of oral tedizolid phosphate (TR-701) in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 Sep;56(9):4608-13. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00458-12. Epub 2012 Jun 11. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012. PMID: 22687509 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Antibacterial Activity of Tedizolid, a Novel Oxazolidinone Against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Microb Drug Resist. 2019 Nov;25(9):1330-1337. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2018.0457. Epub 2019 Jul 10. Microb Drug Resist. 2019. PMID: 31290721
-
European perspective and update on the management of complicated skin and soft tissue infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus after more than 10 years of experience with linezolid.Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014 Apr;20 Suppl 4:3-18. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12463. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014. PMID: 24580738 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical