Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 17;48(1):6.
doi: 10.1186/s40463-019-0330-2.

Perioperative Teaching and Feedback: How are we doing in Canadian OTL-HNS programs?

Affiliations

Perioperative Teaching and Feedback: How are we doing in Canadian OTL-HNS programs?

Z Chaudhry et al. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Discrepancies between resident and faculty perceptions regarding optimal teaching and feedback during surgery are well known but these differences have not yet been described in Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (OTL-HNS). The objectives were thus to compare faculty and resident perceptions of perioperative teaching and feedback in OTL-HNS residency programs across Canada with the aim of highlighting potential areas for improvement.

Methods: An anonymous electronic questionnaire was distributed to residents and teaching faculty in OTL-HNS across Canada with additional paper copies distributed at four institutions. Surveys consisted of ratings on a 5-point Likert scale and open-ended questions. Responses among groups were analysed with the Wilcoxon-Mann Whitney test, while thematic analysis was used for the open-ended questions.

Results: A total of 143 teaching faculty and residents responded with statistically significant differences on 11 out of 25 variables. Namely, faculty reported higher rates of pre and intra-operative teaching compared to resident reports. Faculty also felt they gave adequate feedback on residents' strengths and technical skills contrary to what the residents thought. Both groups did agree however that pre-operative discussion is not consistently done, nor is feedback consistently given or sought.

Conclusion: Faculty and residents in OTL-HNS residency programs disagree on the frequency and optimal timing of peri-operative teaching and feedback. This difference in perception emphasizes the need for a more structured approach to feedback delivery including explicitly stating when feedback is being given, and the overall need for better communication between residents and staff.

Keywords: Education; Feedback; Otolaryngology.; Perioperative; Teaching.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Institutional ethics board approval was granted prior to the start of the study. Study number: A01-E02-15B.

Consent for publication

By completing the survey participants consented to participation in the study and had the right to withdraw at any point.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rose JS, Waibel BH, Schenarts PJ. Disparity between resident and faculty surgeons' perceptions of preoperative preparation, intraoperative teaching, and postoperative feedback. J Surg Educ. 2011;68(6):459–464. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.04.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bing-You RG, Paterson J, Levine M. Feedback falling on deaf ears: residents’ receptivity to feedback tempered by sender credibility. Medical teacher. 1997;19:40–44. doi: 10.3109/01421599709019346. - DOI
    1. DaRosa DA, Zwischenberger JB, Meyerson SL, George BC, Teitelbaum EN, Soper NJ, et al. A theory-based model for teaching and assessing residents in the operating room. J Surg Educ. 2013;70(1):24–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.07.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jensen AR, Wright AS, Kim S, Horvath KD, Calhoun KE. Educational feedback in the operating room: a gap between resident and faculty perceptions. Am J Surg. 2012;204(2):248–255. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.08.019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA. 1983;250(6):777–781. doi: 10.1001/jama.1983.03340060055026. - DOI - PubMed