Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 18:24:36-44.
doi: 10.12659/AOT.912444.

Efficacy and Safety of Delayed Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus Initiation in De Novo Hepatitis C Virus-Negative Orthotopic Liver Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center, Single-Arm, Prospective Study

Affiliations

Efficacy and Safety of Delayed Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus Initiation in De Novo Hepatitis C Virus-Negative Orthotopic Liver Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center, Single-Arm, Prospective Study

Laura Lladó et al. Ann Transplant. .

Abstract

BACKGROUND Delaying initiation of tacrolimus after liver transplantation (LT) is a potential renal-sparing strategy. We assessed safety and efficacy of delayed initiation of prolonged-release tacrolimus (PR-T) in de novo LT. MATERIAL AND METHODS This was a single-center, single-arm, prospective, 12-month observational study of hepatitis C virus-negative orthotopic LT patients. Immunosuppression included PR-T (initially 0.1 or 0.2 mg/kg/day) initiated on Day 3 post LT, basiliximab (20 mg) on post-transplantation Day 0 and Day 4, and intraoperative corticosteroids (500 mg). Patients received maintenance corticosteroids and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) according to center protocol. MMF dose was adjusted according to thrombocyte count. The primary endpoint was the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) measured using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease 4-variable formula at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR) and dialysis requirement. Adverse events were recorded. RESULTS Sixty-nine patients (mean age 55.0 years) were included. Most patients started MMF on Day 1 (60.9%) or Day 2 (10.1%), and PR-T on Day 3 (55.1%) or Day 4 (29.0%). Mean tacrolimus trough levels (ng/mL) were: Day 7, 9.5±6.3; Day 10, 9.4±5.4; Month 1, 8.0±3.1; Month 3, 7.8±3.7; Month 6, 8.0±4.1; and Month 12, 7.2±3.1. Mean 12-month eGFR was 77.2±24.5 mL/min/1.73 m2; 72.5% of patients had eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m² at 12 months; 89.9% had no eGFR measurements <40 mL/min/1.73 m² during the study. Renal insufficiency (any eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m²) was diagnosed in 27.5% of patients; one patient required dialysis. There were no BCAR episodes; the infection rate was 36.2%, and 3 patients died. Overall, 19 patients (27.5%) developed de novo diabetes mellitus, 18 patients (26.1%) had hypercholesterolemia, and 12 patients (17.4%) had hypertriglyceridemia. CONCLUSIONS Quadruple therapy with delayed administration of PR-T was well tolerated and efficacious, and was associated with acceptable renal function over 12 months.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest

LL, JF, and ER report grants from Astellas, during the conduct of the study and personal fees from Astellas outside the submitted work. CB reports grants from Astellas, during the conduct of the study and personal fees from Janssen outside the submitted work. EGV and JB report grants from Astellas, during the conduct of the study. XX reports personal fees from Gilead, outside the submitted work. AGC has no conflicts to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Days of initiation of PR-T and MMF. MMF – mycophenolate mofetil; PR-T – prolonged-release tacrolimus.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean dose and trough levels. (A) Mean doses of prolonged-release tacrolimus. (B) Mean trough tacrolimus blood levels. The earliest day of tacrolimus initiation was Day 2, and most patients initiated tacrolimus between Day 3 (n=38; 55.1%) and Day 4 (n=20; 29.0%). (C) Mean doses of MMF. The n numbers under each graph represent the number of patients with available data. LT – liver transplantation; MMF – mycophenolate mofetil; SD – standard deviation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Evolution of kidney function by eGFR (MDRD-4) and serum creatinine level. Mean ±SD eGFR and serum creatinine during follow-up. Number of patients=69 except for Month 3 (n=68), Month 6, and Month 12 (n=66). The n numbers under the graph represent the number of patients with available data. eGFR – estimated glomerular filtration rate; LT – liver transplantation; MDRD – Modified Diet in Renal Disease; SD – standard deviation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Morrisey PE, Flynn ML, Lin S, et al. Medication noncompliance and its implications in transplant recipients. Drugs. 2007;67:1463–81. - PubMed
    1. Ojo AO, Held PJ, Port FK, et al. Chronic renal failure after transplantation of a nonrenal organ. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:931–40. - PubMed
    1. Zhang W, Fung J. Limitations of current liver transplant immunosuppressive regimens: Renal considerations. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2017;16:27–32. - PubMed
    1. Durand F. Hot-topic debate on kidney function: Renal-sparing approaches are beneficial. Liver Transplant. 2011;17:S43–49. - PubMed
    1. Nankivell BJ, Chapman JR, Bonovas G, Gruenewald SM. Oral cyclosporine but not tacrolimus reduces renal transplant blood flow. Transplantation. 2004;77:1457–59. - PubMed