Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Jan 17;9(1):20.
doi: 10.1038/s41398-018-0366-5.

Stratification and prediction of remission in first-episode psychosis patients: the OPTiMiSE cohort study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Stratification and prediction of remission in first-episode psychosis patients: the OPTiMiSE cohort study

Emanuela Martinuzzi et al. Transl Psychiatry. .

Erratum in

  • Correction: Stratification and prediction of remission in first-episode psychosis patients: the OPTiMiSE cohort study.
    Martinuzzi E, Barbosa S, Daoudlarian D, Ali WBH, Gilet C, Fillatre L, Khalfallah O, Troudet R, Jamain S, Fond G, Sommer I, Leucht S, Dazzan P, McGuire P, Arango C, Diaz-Caneja CM, Fleischhacker W, Rujescu D, Glenthøj B, Winter I, Kahn RS, Yolken R, Lewis S, Drake R, Davidovic L, Leboyer M, Glaichenhaus N; OPTiMiSE Study Group. Martinuzzi E, et al. Transl Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 21;9(1):171. doi: 10.1038/s41398-019-0505-7. Transl Psychiatry. 2019. PMID: 31227688 Free PMC article.

Abstract

Early response to first-line antipsychotic treatments is strongly associated with positive long-term symptomatic and functional outcome in psychosis. Unfortunately, attempts to identify reliable predictors of treatment response in first-episode psychosis (FEP) patients have not yet been successful. One reason for this could be that FEP patients are highly heterogeneous in terms of symptom expression and underlying disease biological mechanisms, thereby impeding the identification of one-size-fits-all predictors of treatment response. We have used a clustering approach to stratify 325 FEP patients into four clinical subtypes, termed C1A, C1B, C2A and C2B, based on their symptoms assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scale. Compared to C1B, C2A and C2B patients, those from the C1A subtype exhibited the most severe symptoms and were the most at risk of being non-remitters when treated with the second-generation antipsychotic drug amisulpride. Before treatment, C1A patients exhibited higher serum levels of several pro-inflammatory cytokines and inflammation-associated biomarkers therefore validating our stratification approach on external biological measures. Most importantly, in the C1A subtype, but not others, lower serum levels of interleukin (IL)-15, higher serum levels of C-X-C motif chemokine 12 (CXCL12), previous exposure to cytomegalovirus (CMV), use of recreational drugs and being younger were all associated with higher odds of being non-remitters 4 weeks after treatment. The predictive value of this model was good (mean area under the curve (AUC) = 0.73 ± 0.10), and its specificity and sensitivity were 45 ± 0.09% and 83 ± 0.03%, respectively. Further validation and replication of these results in clinical trials would pave the way for the development of a blood-based assisted clinical decision support system in psychosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Clinical characteristics of patient subtypes.
a First-level stratification. Silhouettes and t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) representations of patient clustering using principal component analysis (PCA)-K-means (left panels) and K-sparse* (right panels). Silhouette values could range from −1 to +1, with high values reflecting higher similarity within cluster. Mean silhouette values (coefficient) are indicated. b Second-level stratification. Silhouettes of C1 (left) and C2 (right) patient clustering using K-sparse*. Mean silhouette values (coefficient) are indicated. c Three-dimensional (3D) scatter plot representation of positive PANSS (PPANSS), negative PANSS (NPANSS) and general psychopathology PANSS (GPANSS) sub-scores of C1A, C1B, C2A and C2B patients. PANSS Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5®), 5th edn (American Psychiatric Publishing, Arlington, 2013).
    1. Kane J, Leucht S, Carpenter D, Docherty J, Disorders, E.C.P.f.O.P.T.o.P. The expert consensus guideline series. Optimizing pharmacologic treatment of psychotic disorders. Introduction: methods, commentary, and summary. J. Clin. Psychiatry. 2003;64(Suppl 12):5–19. - PubMed
    1. Leucht S, Arbter D, Engel RR, Kissling W, Davis JM. How effective are second-generation antipsychotic drugs? A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials. Mol. Psychiatry. 2009;14:429–447. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4002136. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lieberman JA, Dixon LB, Goldman HH. Early detection and intervention in schizophrenia: a new therapeutic model. JAMA. 2013;310:689–690. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.8804. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dixon LB, Stroup TS. Medications for first-episode psychosis: making a good start. Am. J. Psychiatry. 2015;172:209–211. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.14111465. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types