Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jan;17(1):3-10.
doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9583. Epub 2018 Oct 16.

Patient-derived xenograft mouse models: A high fidelity tool for individualized medicine

Affiliations
Review

Patient-derived xenograft mouse models: A high fidelity tool for individualized medicine

Cong Xu et al. Oncol Lett. 2019 Jan.

Abstract

Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) mouse models involve the direct transfer of fresh human tumor samples into immunodeficient mice following surgical resection or other medical operations. Gene expression in tumors may be maintained by serial passages of tumors from mouse to mouse. These models aid research into tumor biology and pharmacology without manual manipulation of cell cultures in vitro. and are widely used in individualized cancer therapy/translational medicine, drug development and coclinical trials. PDX models exhibit higher predictive values for clinical outcomes than cell line-derived xenograft models and genetically engineered mouse models. However, PDX models are associated with certain challenges in clinical application. The present study reviewed current collections of PDX models and assessed the challenges and future directions of this field.

Keywords: cell line-derived xenografts; genetically engineered mouse models; individualized cancer therapy; patient-derived xenograft mouse models.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Concept of individualized therapy, drug development and coclinical trials. (A) Tumor graft expansion: PDXs generated from multiple patients or a single patient. (B) Overall preclinical analysis. (C) Preclinical testing of anticancer agents. (D) Establishment of a database to integrate genomic and therapeutic analyses. (E) In coclinical trials, an in vivo model to research suspicious resistance mechanisms in cancer cells may be developed. PDX, patient-derived xenograft.

References

    1. DiMasi JA, Reichert JM, Feldman L, Malins A. Clinical approval success rates for investigational cancer drugs. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013;94:329–335. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2013.117. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kola I, Landis J. Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004;3:711–715. doi: 10.1038/nrd1470. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rosfjord E, Lucas J, Li G, Gerber HP. Advances in patient-derived tumor xenografts: From target identification to predicting clinical response rates in oncology. Biochem Pharmacol. 2014;91:135–143. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2014.06.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chawla SP, Cranmer LD, Van Tine BA, Reed DR, Okuno SH, Butrynski JE, Adkins DR, Hendifar AE, Kroll S, Ganjoo KN. Van tine Phase II study of the safety and antitumor activity of the hypoxia-activated prodrug TH-302 in combination with doxorubicin in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:3299–3306. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.3660. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schödel J, Grampp S, Maher ER, Moch H, Ratcliffe PJ, Russo P, Mole DR. Hypoxia-inducible transcription factors, and renal cancer. Eur Urol. 2016;69:646–657. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.007. - DOI - PMC - PubMed