Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec 13;6(12):e1923.
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001923. eCollection 2018 Dec.

Comparisons of Submental and Groin Vascularized Lymph Node Flaps Transfer for Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema

Affiliations

Comparisons of Submental and Groin Vascularized Lymph Node Flaps Transfer for Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema

Olivia A Ho et al. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. .

Abstract

Background: The vascularized groin and submental lymph node (VGLN and VSLN) flaps are valuable options in the treatment of lymphedema. This study was to compare outcomes between VGLN and VSLN transfers for breast cancer-related lymphedema.

Methods: Between January 2008 and December 2016, VGLN and VSLN transfers for upper limb lymphedema were compared including flap characteristics, flap elevation time, complications, and limb circumference changes.

Results: All flaps survived. Similar vein (2.6 versus 3.2 mm; P = 0.3) and artery diameter (2.1 versus 2.8 mm; P = 0.3) and number of lymph nodes (3 versus 4; P = 0.4) were found between VGLN and VSLN groups, respectively. Circumferential reduction rate was higher in VSLN than VGLN (P = 0.04) group. Vascular complication rate with salvage rate was not statistically different between the 2 groups. Donor-site complication and total complication rates were statistically higher in VGLN than VSLN flaps (7.7% versus 0%, P = 0.004; 46.2% versus 23.3%, P = 0.002). At a mean 39.8 ± 22.4 months, the circumferential reduction rate was statistically higher in VSLN than in the VGLN group (55.5 ± 14.3% versus 48.4 ± 23.9%, P = 0.04). Both flaps were effectively decreased in the episodes of cellulitis.

Conclusions: Both VGLN and VSLN flaps are valuable surgical options in treating breast cancer-related lymphedema. However, the VSLN flap for breast cancer-related lymphedema is better in providing more significant improvements in limb circumference, a faster flap harvest time, decreased complication rates, and minimal donor-site iatrogenic lymphedema.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
A 65-year-old woman who was a victim of right breast cancer postmastectomy, axillary lymph node dissection, and chemoradiation. She suffered from right upper limb lymphedema with 3 episodes of cellulitis per year for 2 years. She underwent right vascularized groin lymph node flap transfer to right dorsal wrist. Skin paddle 12 × 6 cm was designed on right groin below the inguinal ligament and close to common femoral vessels. One perforator was marked with pencil of medial Doppler (A). The superficial circumflex vessels were identified with vessel loop. The flap was elevated with short pedicle artery and 2 veins (C). The donor site of right groin 6 years after (D).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
A 52-year-old woman suffered from breast cancer-related lymphedema on right upper limb for 4 years. A vascularized submental lymph node flap 8.5 × 2.2 cm was designed on right neck (A). Three sizable lymph nodes (yellow arrows) were noted on the divided flap (B). Two marginal mandibular nerves were well preserved under microscope (C). The donor site scar was inconspicuous 30 months postoperatively (D).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
The preoperative front view of case 1 (A) and postoperative 48 months follow-up front view (B). The circumferential difference was improved from 52% to 18%.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
The preoperative front view of case 2 (A) and postoperative 30 months follow-up front view (B). The circumferential difference was improved from 32% to 10%.

References

    1. Ugur S, Arici C, Yaprak M, et al. Risk factors of breast cancer-related lymphedema. Lymphat Res Biol. 2013;11:72. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Campisi C, Bellini C, Accogli S, et al. Microsurgery for lymphedema: clinical research and long-term results. Microsurgery. 2010;30:256. - PubMed
    1. Chang DW. Lymphaticovenular bypass for lymphedema management in breast cancer patients: a prospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:752. - PubMed
    1. Koshima I, Nanba Y, Tsutsui T, et al. Minimal invasive lymphaticovenular anastomosis under local anesthesia for leg lymphedema: is it effective for stage III and IV? Ann Plast Surg. 2004;53:261. - PubMed
    1. Cheng MH, Chang DW, Patel KM. Principles and Practice of Lymphedema Surgery. 2016Oxford, UK: Elsevier.