Risk factors for voluntary interruption of pregnancy and possible preventive public health actions
- PMID: 30656234
- PMCID: PMC6319122
- DOI: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2018.59.4.941
Risk factors for voluntary interruption of pregnancy and possible preventive public health actions
Abstract
Introduction: Voluntary interruption of pregnancy (VIP) is one of the most frequent healthcare procedures in the world and a Public Health concern in many countries, especially after liberalization of the abortion laws. The study has been carried out to identify the factors that still influence a fraction of female population towards abortion in the absence of fetal malformations.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study in the period 2012-2016. The survey was carried out on all VIPs performed at the Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit of the University Hospital "G. Martino" in Messina, Italy.
Results: The analyzed sample consisted of 1131 women, aged between 16 and 50 years. Only 4% of VIPs was due to a diagnosis of fetal malformation. In relation to the presence or absence of fetal malformations as the possible reason for VIP, the sample was split up into two groups and the socio-demographic characteristics were considered. VIPs in the absence of malformations were significantly more frequent in younger women with a lower educational level, in unmarried and unemployed women and in women who already had children. These results were confirmed to Pearson test that indicated that all these variables were related to VIP in the absence of malformations.
Conclusions: Based on our results, it is crucial to further prevent requests for VIPs through information and sex education programs for adolescents in schools and consultants, and responsible procreation promotion programs.
Keywords: Prevention; Risk factors; Voluntary interruption of pregnancy.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest statement None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Factors related to the voluntary interruption of pregnancy in Spain.J Prev Med Hyg. 2022 Apr 26;63(1):E69-E75. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2022.63.1.2299. eCollection 2022 Mar. J Prev Med Hyg. 2022. PMID: 35647389 Free PMC article.
-
Contraception in The Netherlands: the low abortion rate explained.Patient Educ Couns. 1994 Jul;23(3):161-71. doi: 10.1016/0738-3991(94)90032-9. Patient Educ Couns. 1994. PMID: 7971545 Review.
-
[Phenomenon of induced abortion carried out by adolescents in Europe and Italy between 1980 and 2010].Minerva Ginecol. 2013 Oct;65(5):525-39. Minerva Ginecol. 2013. PMID: 24096289 Italian.
-
Induced abortion. Effects of marital status, age and parity on choice of pregnancy termination.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1994 Mar;73(3):255-60. doi: 10.3109/00016349409023450. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1994. PMID: 8122509
-
[Prevention Harmful Consumption of Alcohol and Drugs in Sao Tome and Principe Through Public Health Communication: The Scientific Protocol].Acta Med Port. 2020 Apr 1;33(4):229-236. doi: 10.20344/amp.13435. Epub 2020 Apr 1. Acta Med Port. 2020. PMID: 32238236 Review. Portuguese.
References
-
- Vigoureux S. Epidemiology of induced abortion in France. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2016;45(10):1462-1476. - PubMed
-
- Abortion Policies and Reproductive Health around the World. 2014. Available at: http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/policy...
-
- Singh S, Wulf D, Hussain R, Bankole A, Sedgh G. Abortion worldwide: a decade of uneven progress. New York: Guttmacher Institute; Available at: https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/pubs/AWWfullreport.pdf; 2009.
-
- Salvini Bettarini S, Schifini D’Andrea S. Induced abortion in Italy: levels, trends and characteristics. Fam Plann Perspect 1996;28:267-71. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical