Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jan 17;9(1):27.
doi: 10.3390/ani9010027.

A Review of Welfare Assessment Methods in Reptiles, and Preliminary Application of the Welfare Quality® Protocol to the Pygmy Blue-Tongue Skink, Tiliqua adelaidensis, Using Animal-Based Measures

Affiliations
Review

A Review of Welfare Assessment Methods in Reptiles, and Preliminary Application of the Welfare Quality® Protocol to the Pygmy Blue-Tongue Skink, Tiliqua adelaidensis, Using Animal-Based Measures

Amelia L Benn et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Reptiles are held at wildlife parks and zoos for display and conservation breeding programs and are increasingly being kept as pets. Reliable indicators of welfare for reptiles need to be identified. Current guidelines for the captive management of reptiles utilize resource-based, rather than animal-based indicators; the latter being a more direct reflection of affective state. In this paper we review the literature on welfare assessment methods in reptiles with a focus on animal-based measures. We conclude that, whilst a number of physiological and behavioral indicators of welfare have been applied in reptiles, there is need for further validation of these methods across the diversity of species within the Class. Methods of positive welfare state assessment are comparatively understudied and need elucidation. Finally, we examine some widely-used welfare assessment tools in mammals and explore the application of the Welfare Quality® Protocol to the endangered pygmy blue-tongue skink, Tiliqua adelaidensis. We propose that this framework can form the basis for the development of taxon-specific tools with consideration of species-specific biology.

Keywords: assessment tool; play; pygmy skink; reptiles; welfare.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Sherwen S., Hemsworth L., Beausoleil N., Embury A., Mellor D. An animal welfare risk assessment process for zoos. Animals. 2018;8:130. doi: 10.3390/ani8080130. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pet Food Manufacturer’s Association (DFMA) Pet Population 2018. [(accessed on 4 December 2018)]; Available online: https://www.pfma.org.uk/pet-population-2018.
    1. Statista—The Statistics Portal Number of Pets in the United States in 2017/2018, by Species (in Millions) [(accessed on 4 December 2018)]; Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/198095/pets-in-the-united-states-by-...
    1. Warwick C., Jessop M., Arena P., Pliny A., Nicholas E., Lambiris A. Future of keeping pet reptiles and amphibians: Animal welfare and public health perspective. Vet. Rec. 2017;181:454–455. doi: 10.1136/vr.j4640. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Warwick C., Arena P., Lindley S., Jessop M., Steedman C. Assessing reptile welfare using behavioural criteria. In Pract. 2013;35:123–131. doi: 10.1136/inp.f1197. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources