Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2019 Jan 18;19(1):88.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5301-5.

Epidemiological characteristics, clinical outcomes and management patterns of metastatic breast cancer patients in routine clinical care settings of Greece: Results from the EMERGE multicenter retrospective chart review study

Athanasios Kotsakis  1 , Alexandros Ardavanis  2 , Georgios Koumakis  3 , Epameinondas Samantas  4 , Amanta Psyrri  5 , Christos Papadimitriou  6
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Epidemiological characteristics, clinical outcomes and management patterns of metastatic breast cancer patients in routine clinical care settings of Greece: Results from the EMERGE multicenter retrospective chart review study

Athanasios Kotsakis et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: The "EMERGE" study, aimed to capture real-life management patterns and outcomes in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in Greece, also accounting for hormone (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status.

Methods: "EMERGE" was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of adult MBC patients diagnosed between 01-Janaury-2010 and 30-June-2012, either de novo or having progressed from a non-metastatic state. Patient data, including treatment patterns and outcomes, were mainly abstracted through medical chart review.

Results: 386 patients were enrolled by 16 hospital-based oncologists between 12-March-2013 and 31-March-2015. The median look-back period was 29.1 months. At MBC diagnosis, 56.1% of the patients were HR+/HER2-, 16.6% HR+/HER2+, 14.5% HR-/HER2-, and 12.8% HR-/HER2+. In the first line setting, chemotherapy, targeted therapy and endocrine therapy were received by 76.7, 52.4, and 28.3% of the overall population, and by 66.5/36.2/42.0%, 80.4/80.4/28.6%, 88.4/90.7/0.0, and 95.6%/56.5/6.5% of the HR+/HER2-, HR+/HER2+, HR-/HER2+, HR-/HER2- subpopulations, respectively. In the overall population, the disease progression incidence rate was 0.57 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48-0.67] per person-year; median progression-free survival (PFS) was 22.4 (95% CI: 20.4-24.7) and overall survival (OS) was 45.0 (95% CI: 40.9-55.0) months. Median PFS was 24.6 (95% CI: 21.3-27.9) in HR+/HER2-, 19.7 (95% CI: 12.9-25.9) in HR+/HER2+, 23.0 (95% CI: 16.6-29.7) in HR-/HER2+ and 18.3 (95% CI: 10.0-24.7) months in HR-/HER2- subpopulations. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, adjusted among other factors for age and duration of diagnosis, HR and HER2 status, demonstrated that in the overall population PFS was better among those receiving first line endocrine therapy (hazard ratio: 0.70; 95%CI: 0.51-0.95; p = 0.024).

Conclusions: "EMERGE" demonstrates differences between HR/HER2 subtypes in clinical outcomes and divergence from evidence-based guideline recommendations for MBC management, especially as it pertains to the HR+/HER2- patients in which chemotherapy was favored over endocrine therapy in the first line setting.

Study registration: The study has been registered on the electronic Registry of Non-Interventional Studies (RNIS) posted on the website of the Hellenic Association of Pharmaceutical Companies (SFEE): https://www.dilon.sfee.gr/studiesp_d.php?meleti_id=NIS-OGR-XXX-2012/1.

Keywords: Greece; Hormone receptor; Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; Metastatic breast cancer; Overall survival; Progression-free survival; Treatment patterns.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and all applicable local requirements. The original study protocol was reviewed and approved by the competent institutional review boards of the participating hospital sites before the enrollment of any patient into the study and the performance of any study-related procedure. The IRBs which approved the conduct of this study were those of the: General Hospital of Athens “Alexandra”, Athens, Greece; Prefecture General Hospital for Cancer Treatment “Agioi Anargyri”, Athens, Greece (two principal investigators); University General Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece; General University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece; Regional Hospital for Cancer Treatment “Agios Savvas”, Athens, Greece (two principal investigators); 251 Air Force Hospital, Athens, Greece; “Mitera” Maternity Hospital, Athens, Greece; “IASO” General Hospital, Athens, Greece; General Hospital of Chania “Agios Georgios”, Crete, Greece; Piraeus Regional General Hospital for Cancer Treatment “Metaxa”, Piraeus, Greece; General Hospital of Patras “Ag. Andreas”, Patras, Greece; “Metropolitan” Hospital, Piraeus, Greece; Diagnostic Centre of Athens “Hygeia”, Athens, Greece; and “Attikon” University Hospital, Athens, Greece. All subsequent amendments of the study protocol were also approved by the competent institutional review boards. Due to the retrospective chart review design that included the collection of secondary data only and in order to minimize the risk of biasing the clinical outcomes by exclusion from study participation of deceased subjects or patients not able to provide consent, informed consent requirement was not applied.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

AK has nothing to disclose. AA has received honoraria for consultancy in advisory boards from Pfizer, Novartis and Roche. ES has received speaker honoraria from Novartis, BMS, AstraZeneca, Genesis, MSD, Amgen, Merck and Roche. GK has received honoraria for consultancy in advisory boards from Novartis, BMS, AstraZeneca, Genesis, MSD and Roche. AP has received honoraria for consultancy in advisory boards from AstraZeneca, Novartis and Roche and research grants from BMS. CP has received speaker honoraria and honoraria for consultancy in advisory boards from Novartis, AstraZeneca, Genesis, MSD, Amgen, Merck and Roche and research grants from BMS and Roche.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Treatment patterns of systemic therapy in the overall population and subpopulations per HR/HER2 status. Treatment patterns of chemotherapy (CT), endocrine therapy (ET) and targeted therapy (TT) utilized in the (a) first (b) second and (c) third line setting among patients of the overall population and in the subpopulations per HR/HER2 status
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan-Meier progression-free survival (PFS) plots. PFS plots and the relevant log-rank test p-value is shown for MBC patients (a) diagnosed de novo versus at an earlier stage and (b) per HR/HER2 status
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Kaplan-Meier overall survival (OS) plots. OS plots and the relevant log-rank test p-value is shown for MBC patients (a) diagnosed de novo versus at an earlier stage and (b) per HR/HER2 status
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration. Fitzmaurice C, Allen C, Barber RM, Barregard L, Bhutta ZA, Brenner H, et al. Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-years for 32 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2015: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3:524–548. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5688. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J, Rosso S, Coebergh JW, Comber H, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:1374–1403. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.12.027. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results. SEER Stat Fact Sheets: Breast Cancer. SEER Cancer Statistics Review 2006–2012. Available at https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/breast.html. Accessed December 6, 2016.
    1. Lu J, Steeg PS, Price JE, Krishnamurthy S, Mani SA, Reuben J, et al. Breast cancer metastasis: challenges and opportunities. Cancer Res. 2009;69:4951–4953. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0099. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bonotto M, Gerratana L, Poletto E, Driol P, Giangreco M, Russo S, et al. Measures of outcome in metastatic breast cancer: insights from a real-world scenario. Oncologist. 2014;19:608–615. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types