Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jan 18;19(1):14.
doi: 10.1186/s12905-019-0711-8.

Cesarean scar endometriosis: presentation of 198 cases and literature review

Affiliations
Review

Cesarean scar endometriosis: presentation of 198 cases and literature review

Ping Zhang et al. BMC Womens Health. .

Abstract

Background: Cesarean scar endometriosis (CSE) is the most common type of abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE). The aim of this study was to systematically identify the clinical features of CSE and recommend precautionary measures.

Methods: A large, retrospective study was undertaken with CSE patients treated surgically at our hospital between January 2005 and December 2017.

Results: A total of 198 CSE patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 32.0 ± 4.0 years. The main complaint of the patients was abdominal mass (98.5%), followed by cyclic pain (86.9%). The latency period of CSE was 31.6 ± 23.9 months, and the duration between the onset of symptoms and this surgery was 28.3 ± 25.0 months. A majority (80.8%, n = 160) of the patients had undergone a Pfannenstiel incision, and a minority (19.2%, n = 38) a vertical midline incision. The latency period of CSE in the case of a Pfannenstiel incision was significantly shorter than that in the case of a vertical midline incision (24.0 vs 33.0 months, P = 0.006). A total of 187 (94.4%) patients had a single endometrioma, 11 (5.6%) patients had multiple endometriomas, and the 11 multiple-endometrioma patients had all undergone a Pfannenstiel incision. Lesions of endometrioma were common in corner sites, after either incision: 142/171 (83.0%) in Pfannenstiel incision scars and 32/38 (84.2%) in vertical incision scars.

Conclusions: The findings of this study indicate that the Pfannenstiel incision carries a higher risk of CSE than the vertical midline incision. Thorough cleaning at the conclusion of CS, particularly of both corner sites of the adipose layer and the fascia layer, is strongly recommended for CSE prevention. Further studies might provide additional recommendations.

Keywords: Abdominal wall endometriosis; Cesarean scar endometriosis; Cesarean section; Pfannenstiel incision.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the ethical review committee of the International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital (IPMCH).

Consent for publication

Consent was obtained from the patients for the publication of this report.

Competing interests

The author declares that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Williams HE, Barsky S, Storino W. Umbilical endometrioma (silent type) Arch Dermatol. 1976;112(10):1435–1436. doi: 10.1001/archderm.1976.01630340053014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Steck WD, Helwig EB. Cutaneous endometriosis. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1966;9(2):373–383. doi: 10.1097/00003081-196606000-00007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Markham SM, Carpenter SE, Rock JA. Extrapelvic endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 1989;16(1):193–219. - PubMed
    1. Ideyi SC, Schein M, Niazi M, Gerst PH. Spontaneous endometriosis of the abdominal wall. Dig Surg. 2003;20(3):246–248. doi: 10.1159/000070392. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blanco RG, Parithivel VS, Shah AK, Gumbs MA, Schein M, Gerst PH. Abdominal wall endometriomas. Am J Surg. 2003;185(6):596–598. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(03)00072-2. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types