Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jan 18;14(1):17.
doi: 10.1186/s13023-019-0997-5.

Treatment of thoracolumbar kyphosis in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type I: results of an international consensus procedure

Affiliations
Review

Treatment of thoracolumbar kyphosis in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type I: results of an international consensus procedure

Gé-Ann Kuiper et al. Orphanet J Rare Dis. .

Abstract

Background: In all patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I), skeletal disease (dysostosis multiplex) is a prominent, debilitating, condition related complication that may impact strongly on activities of daily living. Unfortunately, it is not alleviated by treatment with hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) or enzyme replacement therapy (ERT). Although early kyphosis is one of the key features of dysostosis multiplex, there is no international consensus on the optimal management. Therefore, an international consensus procedure was organized with the aim to develop the first clinical practice guideline for the management of thoracolumbar kyphosis in MPS I patients.

Methods: A literature review was conducted to identify all available information about kyphosis and related surgery in MPS I patients. Subsequently, a modified Delphi procedure was used to develop consensus statements. The expert panel included 10 spinal orthopedic surgeons, 6 pediatricians and 3 physiotherapists, all experienced in MPS I. The procedure consisted of 2 written rounds, a face-to-face meeting and a final written round. The first 2 rounds contained case histories, general questions and draft statements. During the face-to-face meeting consensus statements were developed. In the final round, the panel had the opportunity to anonymously express their opinion about the proposed statements.

Results: Eighteen case series and case reports were retrieved from literature reporting on different surgical approaches and timing of thoracolumbar kyphosis surgery in MPS I. During the face-to-face meeting 16 statements were discussed and revised. Consensus was reached on all statements.

Conclusion: This international consensus procedure resulted in the first clinical practice guideline for the management of thoracolumbar kyphosis in MPS I patients, focusing on the goals and timing of surgery, as well as the optimal surgical approach, the utility of bracing and required additional assessments (e.g. radiographs). Most importantly, it was concluded that the decision for surgery depends not only on the kyphotic angle, but also on additional factors such as the progression of the deformity and its flexibility, the presence of symptoms, growth potential and comorbidities. The eventual goal of treatment is the maintenance or improvement of quality of life. Further international collaborative research related to long-term outcome of kyphosis surgery in MPS I is essential as prognostic information is lacking.

Keywords: (3–10): Mucopolysaccharidosis type I; Brace; Clinical practice guideline; Dysostosis multiplex; International consensus meeting; Kyphotic angle; Literature review; Modified Delphi method; Residual disease; Surgery; Thoracolumbar kyphosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

G. Kuiper, E. Langereis, S. Breyer, M. Carbone, R. Castelein, D. Eastwood, C. Garin, N. Guffon, P. van Hasselt, P. Hensman, S. Jones, V. Kenis, M. Kruyt, J. van der Lee, W. Mackenzie, P. Orchard, N. Oxborrow, R. Parini, A. Robinson and E. Schubert Hjalmarsson, K. White and F. Wijburg declare that they have no competing interests related to the content of this paper.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Moore D, Connock MJ, Wraith E, Lavery C. The prevalence of and survival in Mucopolysaccharidosis I: Hurler, Hurler-Scheie and Scheie syndromes in the UK. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2008;3:24. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-3-24. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Poorthuis BJ, Wevers RA, Kleijer WJ, Groener JE, de Jong JG, van Weely S, et al. The frequency of lysosomal storage diseases in the Netherlands. Hum Genet. 1999;105:151–156. doi: 10.1007/s004399900075. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wraith JE, Jones S. Mucopolysaccharidosis type I. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev. 2014;12 Suppl 1:102–106. - PubMed
    1. Aldenhoven M, Sakkers RJB, Boelens J, de Koning TJ, Wulffraat NM. Musculoskeletal manifestations of lysosomal storage disorders. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:1659–1665. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.095315. - DOI - PubMed
    1. White KK. Orthopaedic aspects of mucopolysaccharidoses. Rheumatology. 2011;50(Suppl 5):v26–v33. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker393. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types