Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Jun;57(6):471-481.
doi: 10.1038/s41393-019-0239-7. Epub 2019 Jan 18.

Comparison of peak oxygen consumption response to aquatic and robotic therapy in individuals with chronic motor incomplete spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of peak oxygen consumption response to aquatic and robotic therapy in individuals with chronic motor incomplete spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled trial

Peter H Gorman et al. Spinal Cord. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

Study design: Randomized dual center controlled clinical trial.

Objective: To determine and compare the cardiorespiratory impact of 3 months of aquatic and robotic therapy for individuals with chronic motor incomplete spinal cord injury (CMISCI).

Settings: Two rehabilitation specialty hospitals.

Methods: Thirty-one individuals with CMISCI with neurological level between C2-T12 at least 1 year post injury were randomized to either aquatic or robotic treadmill therapy for 36 sessions. Customized sessions lasted 40-45 min at 65-75% heart rate reserve intensity with peak oxygen consumption (peak VO2) measured during arm ergometry at baseline and post intervention. Additional peak robotic treadmill VO2 assessments were obtained before and after training for participants randomized to robotic intervention.

Results: Peak VO2 measured with arm ergometry was not significantly different with either aquatic intervention (8.1%, p = 0.14, n = 15) or robotic intervention (-0.7%, p = 0.31, n = 17). Peak VO2 measured with robotic treadmill ergometry demonstrated a statistical improvement (14.7%, p = 0.03, n = 17, two-tailed t-test) across the robotic intervention. Comparison between the two interventions demonstrated a trend favoring aquatic therapy for improving arm ergometry peak VO2 (ANOVA, p = 0.063).

Conclusions: Neither 3-month exercise interventions statistically improved arm cycle ergometry peak VO2, our cardiorespiratory surrogate marker, although percent improvement was greater in the aquatic exercise condition. Robotic ergometry peak VO2 did improve for the robotic intervention, confirming previous work. These results suggest that either intervention may hold utility in improving cardiorespiratory fitness in CMISCI, but peak VO2 measurement technique appears critical in detecting effects.

Sponsorship: DOD CDMRP SCI Research Program Clinical Trial Award SC090147, FY 2009. This study is registered under ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01407354.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Phys Ther. 2011 May;91(5):675-88 - PubMed
    1. Spinal Cord. 2015 Feb;53(2):84-91 - PubMed
    1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Nov;96(11):2033-40.e1 - PubMed
    1. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1980;12(2):61-5 - PubMed
    1. Spinal Cord. 2005 May;43(5):291-8 - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data