Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Mar;36(3):279-288.
doi: 10.1007/s40266-018-0627-2.

Prescriber Implementation of STOPP/START Recommendations for Hospitalised Older Adults: A Comparison of a Pharmacist Approach and a Physician Approach

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Prescriber Implementation of STOPP/START Recommendations for Hospitalised Older Adults: A Comparison of a Pharmacist Approach and a Physician Approach

Kieran Dalton et al. Drugs Aging. 2019 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) conducted simultaneously in the same Irish university teaching hospital have shown that provision of Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions (STOPP)/Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment (START) recommendations to attending prescribers by a physician or a pharmacist can reduce in-hospital adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in older adults (≥ 65 years). The aims of this study were to compare the prescriber implementation rates of STOPP/START recommendations between the physician approach and the pharmacist approach in these two RCTs and to provide a narrative summary of the comparable clinical outcomes.

Methods: Data were extracted from the two RCT published papers and their associated computerised databases to calculate the percentage prescriber implementation rates for the STOPP/START recommendations. The Chi-square test was used to quantify the differences in prescriber implementation rates, with differences considered statistically significant where p < 0.05.

Results: Prescriber implementation rates of the STOPP and START recommendations made by the physician were 81.2% and 87.4% respectively, significantly higher than those made by the pharmacist (39.2% and 29.5% respectively), p < 0.0001. A greater absolute risk reduction in patients with ADRs was shown with the physician's intervention compared to the pharmacist's intervention (9.3% vs 6.8%).

Conclusion: This study shows that the methods of communication and the medium through which the STOPP/START recommendations are delivered significantly affect their implementation. Non-implementation of some pharmacist-delivered recommendations may be contributing to preventable ADRs in older adults. Thus, future research should aim to identify the factors influencing prescriber implementation of pharmacist recommendations in order to inform the design of more effective pharmacist interventions in optimising older patients' pharmacotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Age Ageing. 2012 Nov;41(6):771-6 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2013 Oct;38(5):360-72 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 2007 Jul 14;370(9582):173-184 - PubMed
    1. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2012 Jan-Feb;8(1):36-46 - PubMed
    1. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2006 Apr 15;63(8):740-3 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources