Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 19;23(1):4.
doi: 10.1007/s11916-019-0745-5.

A Systematic Review of Radiofrequency Treatment of the Ankle for the Management of Chronic Foot and Ankle Pain

Vwaire Orhurhu  1 , Ivan Urits  1 , Sebastian Orman  2 , Omar Viswanath  3   4   5 , Alaa Abd-Elsayed  6
Affiliations

A Systematic Review of Radiofrequency Treatment of the Ankle for the Management of Chronic Foot and Ankle Pain

Vwaire Orhurhu et al. Curr Pain Headache Rep. .

Abstract

Background: Chronic pain of the lower extremity remains challenging to manage. Radiofrequency treatment applies heat to nerve fibers with the goal of mitigating chronic pain conditions. The clinical efficacy has not yet been adequately established for pathologies of the ankle and foot. In this review paper, we report the use and efficacy of radiofrequency treatment applied to foot and ankle pain.

Recent findings: PubMed and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched (final search 30 March 2018) using the MeSH terms "radiofrequency ablation," "neurolysis," "radiofrequency therapy," "pain syndrome," "analgesia," "plantar heel pain," "plantar fascitis," and "chronic pain" in the English literature. Of the 23 papers screened, 18 were further investigated for relevance. Our final search methodology yielded 15 studies that investigated the use of radiofrequency treatment at the ankle. Of these 15 studies, there were three randomized control trials, four prospective studies, three retrospective studies, and five case reports. The quality of selected publications was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias instrument. The evidence from our studies suggests that radiofrequency treatment can be used safely for the management foot and ankle pain. The technique (continuous vs pulsatile), temperature, location of treatment, and duration of administration need more thorough evaluation. Randomized control trials are needed to establish the efficacy and safety profile of radiofrequency ablation and its long-term benefits in patients with chronic pain of the foot and ankle.

Conclusion: The evidence from our studies suggests that radiofrequency treatment can be used safely for the management foot and ankle pain. The technique (continuous vs pulsatile), temperature, location of treatment, and duration of administration need more thorough evaluation. Randomized control trials are needed to establish the efficacy and safety profile of radiofrequency ablation and its long-term benefits in patients with chronic pain of the foot and ankle.

Keywords: Analgesia; Ankle pain; Foot pain; Radiofrequency ablation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Foot Ankle Int. 1999 Apr;20(4):214-21 - PubMed
    1. Br J Sports Med. 2002 Apr;36(2):95-101 - PubMed
    1. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2002 Dec;16(4):597-617 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 May;85-A(5):872-7 - PubMed
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 2004 Mar 1;159(5):491-8 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources