Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct-Dec;12(4):832-836.
doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_144_18.

Labor Epidural Analgesia: Comparison of Two Different Intermittent Bolus Regimes

Nitu Puthenveettil  1 , Anish Mohan  1 , Sunil Rajan  1 , Jerry Paul  1 , Lakshmi Kumar  1
Affiliations

Labor Epidural Analgesia: Comparison of Two Different Intermittent Bolus Regimes

Nitu Puthenveettil et al. Anesth Essays Res. 2018 Oct-Dec.

Abstract

Background: Optimal labor analgesia can be provided with epidural by addition of opioid to the local anesthetic.

Aims: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of labor epidural bolus regimes 20 mL of 0.1% ropivacaine with 40 μg fentanyl versus 15 mL of 0.1% ropivacaine with 15 μg fentanyl as epidural bolus dose.

Settings and design: This was prospective double-blinded randomized study.

Materials and methods: After approval from the Institutional Ethical Committee, 50 consenting parturients in active labor were allotted into two groups by closed envelope technique. Group A received 20 mL of 0.1% ropivacaine with 40 μg fentanyl, whereas Group B received 15 mL of 0.1% ropivacaine with 15 μg fentanyl as an epidural bolus dose. The onset, duration of analgesia, motor block, top-up doses required, consumption of ropivacaine, and fentanyl and fetomaternal outcome were compared.

Statistical analysis used: Numerical variables are expressed as a mean and standard deviation and categorical variables are expressed as frequency and percentages. To obtain the association between categorical variables and different doses Fischer's exact test was applied. To compare clinical parameters between different drug doses independent two-sample t-test were applied. Mann-Whitney U-test applied for nonparametric data. Results: Effective labor analgesia with no motor blockade was observed in both groups with no failure rate. Duration of analgesia was significantly longer in Group A (166.8 ± 54.64 vs. 100.2 ± 32.39 min P < 0.001). The onset of analgesia was faster in Group A (88% vs. 16% within 7 min, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Labor epidural analgesia with larger volume boluses produces faster onset and prolonged duration of analgesia.

Keywords: Epidural analgesia; fentanyl; labor analgesia; ropivacaine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consort flow diagram
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of pain scores
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Lee BB, Ngan Kee WD, Lau WM, Wong AS. Epidural infusions for labor analgesia: A comparison of 0.2% ropivacaine, 0.1% ropivacaine, and 0.1% ropivacaine with fentanyl. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2002;27:31–6. - PubMed
    1. Chhetty YK, Naithani U, Gupta S, Bedi V, Agrawal L, Swain L. Epidural labor analgesia: A comparison of ropivacaine 0.125% versus 0.2% with fentanyl. J Obstet Anaesth Crit Care. 2013;3:16–22.
    1. Comparative Obstetric Mobile Epidural Trial (COMET) Study Group UK. Effect of low-dose mobile versus traditional epidural techniques on mode of delivery: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2001;358:19–23. - PubMed
    1. Lee BB, Ngan Kee WD, Wong EL, Liu JY. Dose-response study of epidural ropivacaine for labor analgesia. Anesthesiology. 2001;94:767–72. - PubMed
    1. Atienzar MC, Palanca JM, Borras R, Esteve I, Fernandez M, Miranda A, et al. Ropivacaine 0.1% with fentanyl 2 microg mL(-1) by epidural infusion for labour analgesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004;21:770–5. - PubMed