Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 21;7(1):e11312.
doi: 10.2196/11312.

Mobile-Based Interventions for Dietary Behavior Change and Health Outcomes: Scoping Review

Affiliations

Mobile-Based Interventions for Dietary Behavior Change and Health Outcomes: Scoping Review

Atreyi Kankanhalli et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. .

Abstract

Background: Mobile apps are being widely used for delivering health interventions, with their ubiquitous access and sensing capabilities. One such use is the delivery of interventions for healthy eating behavior.

Objective: The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive view of the literature on the use of mobile interventions for eating behavior change. We synthesized the studies with such interventions and mapped out their input methods, interventions, and outcomes.

Methods: We conducted a scoping literature search in PubMed/MEDLINE, Association for Computing Machinery Digital Library, and PsycINFO databases to identify relevant papers published between January 2013 and April 2018. We also hand-searched relevant themes of journals in the Journal of Medical Internet Research and registered protocols. Studies were included if they provided and assessed mobile-based interventions for dietary behavior changes and/or health outcomes.

Results: The search resulted in 30 studies that we classified by 3 main aspects: input methods, mobile-based interventions, and dietary behavior changes and health outcomes. First, regarding input methods, 5 studies allowed photo/voice/video inputs of diet information, whereas text input methods were used in the remaining studies. Other than diet information, the content of the input data in the mobile apps included user's demographics, medication, health behaviors, and goals. Second, we identified 6 categories of intervention contents, that is, self-monitoring, feedback, gamification, goal reviews, social support, and educational information. Although all 30 studies included self-monitoring as a key component of their intervention, personalized feedback was a component in 18 studies, gamification was used in 10 studies, goal reviews in 5 studies, social support in 3 studies, and educational information in 2 studies. Finally, we found that 13 studies directly examined the effects of interventions on health outcomes and 12 studies examined the effects on dietary behavior changes, whereas only 5 studies observed the effects both on dietary behavior changes and health outcomes. Regarding the type of studies, although two-thirds of the included studies conducted diverse forms of randomized control trials, the other 10 studies used field studies, surveys, protocols, qualitative interviews, propensity score matching method, and test and reference method.

Conclusions: This scoping review identified and classified studies on mobile-based interventions for dietary behavior change as per the input methods, nature of intervention, and outcomes examined. Our findings indicated that dietary behavior changes, although playing a mediating role in improving health outcomes, have not been adequately examined in the literature. Dietary behavior change as a mechanism for the relationship between mobile-based intervention and health outcomes needs to be further investigated. Our review provides guidance for future research in this promising mobile health area.

Keywords: behavior change; dietary behavior; food intake; health outcomes; mHealth; mobile-based intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the selection process for the scoping review.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anders S, Schroeter C. Diabetes, diet-health behavior, and obesity. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2015 Mar 16;6:33. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2015.00033. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2015.00033. - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jiao J, Moudon AV, Kim SY, Hurvitz PM, Drewnowski A. Health implications of adults' eating at and living near fast food or quick service restaurants. Nutr Diabetes. 2015 Jul 20;5(7):e171. doi: 10.1038/nutd.2015.18. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/26192449 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gittelsohn J, Trude A. Diabetes and obesity prevention: changing the food environment in low-income settings. Nutr Rev. 2017 Jan;75(suppl 1):62–9. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuw038. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/28049750 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Menza V, Probart C. Eating Well for Good Health Lessons on Nutrition & Healthy Diets. Rome, Italy: Food & Agriculture Organization of the UN; 2019. p. 361.
    1. Dalle Grave R, Centis E, Marzocchi R, El Ghoch M, Marchesini G. Major factors for facilitating change in behavioral strategies to reduce obesity. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2013 Oct 3;6:101–10. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S40460. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S40460. - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms