A Web-Based Recovery Program (ICUTogether) for Intensive Care Survivors: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
- PMID: 30664478
- PMCID: PMC6354195
- DOI: 10.2196/10935
A Web-Based Recovery Program (ICUTogether) for Intensive Care Survivors: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Background: Those who experience a critical illness or condition requiring admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) frequently experience physical and psychological complications as a direct result of their critical illness or condition and ICU experience. Complications, if left untreated, can affect the quality of life of survivors and impact health care resources. Explorations of potential interventions to reduce the negative impact of an ICU experience have failed to establish an evidence-based intervention.
Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of a Web-based intensive care recovery program on the mental well-being of intensive care survivors and to determine if it is a cost-effective approach.
Methods: In total, 162 patients that survived an ICU experience will be recruited and randomized into 1 of 2 groups. The intervention group will receive access to the Web-based intensive care recovery program, ICUTogether, 2 weeks after discharge (n=81), and the control group will receive usual care (n=81). Mental well-being will be measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, The Impact of Events Scale-Revised and the 5-level 5-dimension EuroQoL at 3 time points (2 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months post discharge). Family support will be measured using the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support at 3 time points. Analysis will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis using regression modeling. Covariates will include baseline outcome measures, study allocation (intervention or control), age, gender, length of ICU stay, APACHE III score, level of family support, and hospital readmissions. Participants' evaluation of the mobile website will be sought at 12 months postdischarge. A cost utility analysis conducted at 12 months from a societal perspective will consider costs incurred by individuals as well as health care providers.
Results: Participant recruitment is currently underway. Recruitment is anticipated to be completed by December 2020.
Conclusions: This study will evaluate a novel intervention in a group of ICU survivors. The findings from this study will inform a larger study and wider debate about an appropriate intervention in this population.
International registered report identifier (irrid): PRR1-10.2196/10935.
Keywords: intensive care; recovery program; survivor; survivorship.
©Beverley Ewens, Helen Myers, Lisa Whitehead, Karla Seaman, Deborah Sundin, Joyce Hendricks. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 17.01.2019.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Therapeutic respiratory and functional rehabilitation protocol for intensive care unit patients affected by COVID-19: a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.Trials. 2021 Apr 12;22(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05210-y. Trials. 2021. PMID: 33845878 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9. Trials. 2020. PMID: 33115543 Free PMC article.
-
Mobile critical care recovery program (m-CCRP) for acute respiratory failure survivors: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2018 Feb 7;19(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2449-2. Trials. 2018. PMID: 29415760 Free PMC article.
-
Can Coping-Skills Training Help Patients Who Have Received Intensive Hospital Care to Cope with Depression and Anxiety? [Internet].Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2018 Sep. Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2018 Sep. PMID: 37079709 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Factors to consider when designing post-hospital interventions to support critical illness recovery: Systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis.J Intensive Care Soc. 2025 Jan 3;26(1):80-95. doi: 10.1177/17511437241308674. eCollection 2025 Feb. J Intensive Care Soc. 2025. PMID: 39758281 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Exploring the effectiveness of eHealth interventions in treating Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) outcomes: a systematic review.Crit Care. 2024 Sep 27;28(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05089-6. Crit Care. 2024. PMID: 39334262 Free PMC article.
-
Does an educational website improve psychological outcomes and satisfaction among family members of intensive care unit patients?Crit Care Sci. 2023 Mar 1;35(1):31-36. doi: 10.5935/2965-2774.20230113-en. Crit Care Sci. 2023. PMID: 37712727 Free PMC article.
-
Follow-up focused on psychological intervention initiated after intensive care unit in adult patients and informal caregivers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.PeerJ. 2023 Jun 9;11:e15260. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15260. eCollection 2023. PeerJ. 2023. PMID: 37312876 Free PMC article.
-
Digital Health Interventions Supporting Recovery for Intensive Care Patients and Their Family Members: A Scoping Review.Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2024 Nov 30;3(1):100185. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2024.11.006. eCollection 2025 Mar. Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2024. PMID: 40207008 Free PMC article. Review.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous