Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 21;14(1):14.
doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1215-2.

A scoring system predicting acute radiation dermatitis in patients with head and neck cancer treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy

Affiliations

A scoring system predicting acute radiation dermatitis in patients with head and neck cancer treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy

Mitsue Kawamura et al. Radiat Oncol. .

Abstract

Background and purpose: We created a scoring system incorporating dosimetric and clinical factors to assess the risk of severe, acute skin reactions in patients undergoing intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to treat head and neck cancer (HNC).

Materials and methods: A total of 101 consecutive patients who received definitive IMRT or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with a prescription dose of 70 Gy to treat HNC between 2013 and 2017 in our hospital were enrolled. Skin V5Gy, V10Gy, V20Gy, V30Gy, V40Gy, V50Gy, and V60Gy values delivered 5 mm within the body contour were compared between patients with Grades 1-2 and Grade 3 dermatitis. A scoring system was created based on logistic regression analysis (LRA) that identified the most significant dosimetric and clinical factors.

Results: The V60Gy was significantly associated with radiation dermatitis grade in both LRA and recursive partitioning analysis (RPA). A scoring system incorporating the V60Gy, concurrent chemotherapy status, age, and body mass index was used to divide all patients into three subgroups (0-1, 2-3, and 4-6 points) in the RPA. The incidence of Grade 3 dermatitis significantly differed among the subgroups (0, 20.5, and 58.6%, respectively, P < 0.01).

Conclusions: A risk analysis model incorporating dose-volume parameters successfully predicted acute skin reactions and will aid in the appropriate management of radiation dermatitis.

Keywords: Head-and- neck cancer; IMRT; Skin dose; VMAT.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by our local ethics committee, Kyoto University Graduate School and Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University Hospital Ethics committee; reference number E1810.

Consent for publication

All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Competing interests

We wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a DVHs of patients with different dermatitis grades. b Bar graph of each dermatitis grade
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
RPA by risk classification score
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Representative images of patients with dermatitis of various grades. Skin that received 20 Gy (V20Gy): yellow; V60Gy: orange

References

    1. Hong TS, Tome WA, Harari PM. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the management of head and neck cancer. Curr Opin Oncol. 2005;17:231–235. doi: 10.1097/01.cco.0000158734.84099.38. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hendry JH, Jeremic B, Zubizarreta EH. Normal tissue complications after radiation therapy. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2006;20:151–160. doi: 10.1590/S1020-49892006000800012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Popanda O, Ebbeler R, Twardella D, et al. Radiation-induced DNA damage and repair in lymphocytes from breast cancer patients and their correlation with acute skin reactions to radiotherapy. Int J Radiot Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;55:1216–1225. doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(02)04415-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mendelsohn FA, Divino CM, Reis ED, Kerstein MD. Wound care after radiation therapy. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2002;15:216–224. doi: 10.1097/00129334-200209000-00007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Duncan W, MacDougall RH, Kerr GR, Downing D. Adverse effect of treatment gaps in the outcome of radiotherapy for laryngeal cancer. Radiother Oncol. 1996;41:203–207. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8140(96)01838-5. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms