Persistence and treatment-free interval in patients being prescribed biological drugs in rheumatology practices in Germany
- PMID: 30666350
- DOI: 10.1007/s00228-019-02627-y
Persistence and treatment-free interval in patients being prescribed biological drugs in rheumatology practices in Germany
Abstract
Aims: The goal of this study was to analyze persistence and the treatment-free interval in patients being prescribed biological drugs in rheumatology practices in Germany.
Methods: Patients who received a first prescription of biological drugs between 2008 and 2016 in 21 rheumatologists in Germany were included in this study (index date). The main outcome was the rate of persistence with biological drugs as a function of the duration of the treatment-free interval used to define discontinuation. The secondary outcomes were the duration of the treatment-free interval, the probability of restarting therapy, and their respective association with age, gender, and diagnosis (i.e., rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and psoriatic arthritis).
Results: A total of 4925 patients were included in this study. After 5 years of follow-up, the rate of persistence was 32.6%, 51.1%, and 65.7% if discontinuation was defined as a gap of 90, 180, and 360 days respectively. The majority of patients restarted therapy between 91 and 180 days after the discontinuation date. Advanced age was associated with a decreased probability of restarting biological therapy after a treatment-free interval of at least 91 days, with odds ratios ranging from 0.34 in people aged 61-70 years to 0.66 in those aged 31-40 years (reference value: ≤ 30 years). Finally, patients over 70 and those suffering from ankylosing spondylitis had shorter treatment-free intervals compared to those 30 years or younger (adjusted difference of - 117 days) and those suffering from rheumatoid arthritis (- 48 days) respectively.
Conclusion: Persistence varied widely depending on the definition of discontinuation, with the majority of nonpersistent patients restarting biological therapy shortly after discontinuation.
Keywords: Biological drugs; Germany; Persistence; Retrospective study; Rheumatology practices; Treatment-free interval.
Similar articles
-
Persistence with biological drugs in patients treated in rheumatology practices in Germany.Rheumatol Int. 2019 Mar;39(3):525-531. doi: 10.1007/s00296-018-4194-y. Epub 2018 Nov 24. Rheumatol Int. 2019. PMID: 30474720
-
Treatment persistence among patients with rheumatoid disease (RA, AS, PsA) treated with subcutaneous biologics in Germany.Rheumatol Int. 2016 Jan;36(1):143-53. doi: 10.1007/s00296-015-3348-4. Epub 2015 Aug 28. Rheumatol Int. 2016. PMID: 26314368
-
The persistence of golimumab compared to other tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors in daily clinical practice for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis: observations from the Slovenian nation-wide longitudinal registry of patients treated with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs-BioRx.si.Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Feb;38(2):297-305. doi: 10.1007/s10067-018-4324-7. Epub 2018 Oct 15. Clin Rheumatol. 2019. PMID: 30324406
-
Golimumab: in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis.BioDrugs. 2009;23(2):125-35. doi: 10.2165/00063030-200923020-00005. BioDrugs. 2009. PMID: 19489653 Review.
-
Why golimumab in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and rheumatoid arthritis?Reumatismo. 2015 Mar 31;66(4):285-303. doi: 10.4081/reumatismo.2014.799. Reumatismo. 2015. PMID: 25829189 Review.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous