Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Dec;13(6):757-764.
doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00919-0. Epub 2019 Jan 21.

Comparison between single-site and multiport robot-assisted myomectomy

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison between single-site and multiport robot-assisted myomectomy

Gaby N Moawad et al. J Robot Surg. 2019 Dec.

Abstract

Minimizing the number of port incisions during minimally invasive surgery is associated with improved outcomes and patient satisfaction. We designed this work to study the perioperative outcomes of robotic single-site myomectomy (RSSM) in comparison to robotic multiport myomectomy (RMM) in a certain subset of patients. The design of the study is a multicenter retrospective analysis (Canadian Task Force classification III). The setting was three university hospitals. Eighty patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids undergoing robot-assisted single-site myomectomy were selected for the study. These 80 consecutive RSSM patients were matched at the uterine fibroid tumor burden level with 95 consecutive RMM patients performed at the same institutions, by the same surgeons, within a similar time frame. The main outcome measures were estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, overnight admission, and post-operative complications. Of the 175 women, 95 (54.2%) underwent RMM and 80 (45.7%) underwent RSSM. Single-site vs. multiport patient demographics differed significantly in mean age (39.1 vs. 35.6, p < 0.001), and BMI (25.3 vs. 27.5, p < 0.04). Pre-operative MRI fibroid characteristics were matched between the two cohorts. Fibroid size on imaging (5.8 cm vs. 5.9 cm, p = 0.4) and the number of fibroids removed (2.5 vs. 2.3, p = 0.08) were similar between the two groups. After adjustment for multiple covariates with regression models, single-site myomectomy and multiport myomectomy has comparable EBL (83.3 mL vs. 109.2 mL, p = 0.34), operative time (162.4 min vs. 162.4 min, p = 0.99), overnight admission (OR = 1.54, p = 0.44) and a post-operative complication (OR = 1.3, p = 0.78). In selected patients, robotic single-site myomectomy is equivalent to its multiport counterpart. Both surgical approaches are associated with low rates of intra-operative and post-operative complications.

Keywords: Minimally invasive myomectomy; Robotic myomectomy; Single-site myomectomy; Single-site surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Jan-Feb;21(1):64-7 - PubMed
    1. J Robot Surg. 2013 Jun;7(2):137-42 - PubMed
    1. Fertil Steril. 2011 Jun;95(7):2426-8 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 2013 Sep;27(9):3182-6 - PubMed
    1. Fertil Steril. 2014 Oct;102(4):922-32 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources