Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 19;11(1):200.
doi: 10.3390/nu11010200.

Evaluation of the Recipe Function in Popular Dietary Smartphone Applications, with Emphasize on Features Relevant for Nutrition Assessment in Large-Scale Studies

Affiliations

Evaluation of the Recipe Function in Popular Dietary Smartphone Applications, with Emphasize on Features Relevant for Nutrition Assessment in Large-Scale Studies

Liangzi Zhang et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

Nutrient estimations from mixed dishes require detailed information collection and should account for nutrient loss during cooking. This study aims to make an inventory of recipe creating features in popular food diary apps from a research perspective and to evaluate their nutrient calculation. A total of 12 out of 57 screened popular dietary assessment apps included a recipe function and were scored based on a pre-defined criteria list. Energy and nutrient content of three recipes calculated by the apps were compared with a reference procedure, which takes nutrient retention due to cooking into account. The quality of the recipe function varies across selected apps with a mean score of 3.0 (out of 5). More relevant differences (larger than 5% of the Daily Reference Intake) between apps and the reference were observed in micronutrients (49%) than in energy and macronutrients (20%). The primary source of these differences lies in the variation in food composition databases underlying each app. Applying retention factors decreased the micronutrient contents from 0% for calcium in all recipes to more than 45% for vitamins B6, B12, and folate in one recipe. Overall, recipe features and their ability to capture true nutrient intake are limited in current apps.

Keywords: diet apps; dietary intake assessment; food record; nutrient retention; recipe calculations; technological innovations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of selection procedure of dietary assessment apps with recipe function showing the number of apps included or excluded.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Principal Component Analysis (PCA) showing the variation strength and trend of macronutrient difference compared with the reference contents from different apps in (a) Boerenkool stamppot, (b) Pizza with salami, tomato, and mushrooms, (c) Hachee.

References

    1. Cade J.E. Measuring Diet in the 21st Century: Use of New Technologies. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2017;76:276–282. doi: 10.1017/S0029665116002883. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shim J.-S., Oh K., Kim H.C. Dietary Assessment Methods in Epidemiologic Studies. Epidemiol. Health. 2014;36:e2014009. doi: 10.4178/epih/e2014009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Klesges R.C., Eck L.H., Ray J.W. Who Underreports Dietary Intake in a Dietary Recall? Evidence from the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 1995;63:438–444. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.63.3.438. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Livingstone M.B., Robson P.J., Wallace J.M. Issues in Dietary Intake Assessment of Children and Adolescents. Br. J. Nutr. 2004;92(Suppl. 2):S213–S222. doi: 10.1079/BJN20041169. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schober M.F. Questions about Questions: Inquiries into the Cognitive Bases of Surveys. Russell Sage Foundation; New York, NY, USA: 1992. Asking Questions and Influencing Answers; pp. 15–48.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources