Integrating 16S rRNA Sequencing and LC⁻MS-Based Metabolomics to Evaluate the Effects of Live Yeast on Rumen Function in Beef Cattle
- PMID: 30669471
- PMCID: PMC6356510
- DOI: 10.3390/ani9010028
Integrating 16S rRNA Sequencing and LC⁻MS-Based Metabolomics to Evaluate the Effects of Live Yeast on Rumen Function in Beef Cattle
Abstract
We evaluated the effects of live yeast on ruminal bacterial diversity and metabolome of beef steer. Eight rumen-cannulated Holstein steers were assigned randomly to one of two treatment sequences in a study with two 25-d experimental periods and a crossover design. The steers were housed in individual pens. The dietary treatments were control (CON) or yeast (YEA; CON plus 15 g/d of live yeast product). Bacterial diversity was examined by sequencing the V3-V4 region of 16S rRNA gene. The metabolome analysis was performed using a liquid chromatograph and a mass spectrometry system (LC⁻MS). Live yeast supplementation increased the relative abundance of eight cellulolytic bacterial genera as well as Anaerovorax and Lachnospiraceae. Proteiniclasticum, Salmonella, and Lactococcus were not detected in the YEA treatment. Live yeast supplementation increased the concentrations of 4-cyclohexanedione and glucopyranoside and decreased the concentrations of threonic acid, xanthosine, deoxycholic acid, lauroylcarnitine, methoxybenzoic acid, and pentadecylbenzoic acid. The bacteroidales BS11, Christensenellaceae R-7, and Candidatus saccharimonas showed positive correlations with the metabolites involved in amino acid biosynthesis and the metabolism of energy substrates; the functions of these bacteria are not fully understood in relation to the mode of action of yeast. This study confirms the usefulness of LC⁻MS-based metabolomics in deciphering the mode of action of live yeast in the rumen.
Keywords: bacterial diversity; beef steer; live yeast; ruminal metabolome.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures



References
-
- McAllister T.A., Beauchemin K.A., Alazzeh A.Y., Baah J., Teather R.M., Stanford K. Review: The use of direct-fed microbials to mitigate pathogens and methane production in cattle. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2011;91:193–211. doi: 10.4141/cjas10047. - DOI
-
- Chaucheyras-Durand F., Chevaux E., Martin C., Forano E. Use of yeast probiotics in ruminants: Effects and mechanisms of action on rumen pH, fibre degradation, and microbiota according to the diet. In: Rigobelo E.C., editor. Probiotic in Animals. InTech; Rijeka, Croatia: 2012. pp. 119–162.
-
- Jiang Y., Ogunade I.M., Qi S., Hackmann T.J., Staples C.R., Adesogan A.T. Effects of the dose and viability of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. 1. Diversity of ruminal microbes as analyzed by Illumina MiSeq sequencing and quantitative PCR. J. Dairy Sci. 2017;100:325–342. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11263. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Chaucheyras-Durand F., Walker N.D., Bach A. Effects of active dry yeasts on the rumen microbial ecosystem: Past, present, and future. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2008;145:5–26. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.04.019. - DOI
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources