Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 21;9(1):e023069.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023069.

The relationship between interviewer-respondent familiarity and family planning outcomes in the Democratic Republic of Congo: a repeat cross-sectional analysis

Affiliations

The relationship between interviewer-respondent familiarity and family planning outcomes in the Democratic Republic of Congo: a repeat cross-sectional analysis

Philip Anglewicz et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: The typical approach of survey data collection is to use interviewers who are not from the study site and do not know the participants, yet the implications of this approach on data quality have seldom been investigated. We examine the relationship between interviewer-respondent familiarity and selected family planning outcomes, and whether this relationship changes over time between 2015 and 2016.

Setting: We use data from the Performance Monitoring and Accountability 2020 Project in Kongo Central Province, Democratic Republic of Congo.

Participants: Participants include representative samples of women of reproductive ages (15 to 49), 1565 interviewed in 2015 and 1668 in 2016. The study used a two-stage cluster design: first randomly selecting enumeration areas (EAs), then randomly selecting households within each EA.

Design: We first identify individual characteristics associated with familiarity between RE and respondent. Next, we examine the relationship between RE-respondent acquaintance and family planning outcomes. Finally, we use two waves of data to examine whether this relationship changes over time between 2015 and 2016.

Results: In multivariate analysis, interviewer-respondent acquaintance is significantly associated with last birth unintended (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.17 to 3.13) and reported infertility in 2015 (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.03 to 4.95); and any contraceptive use (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.28), traditional contraceptive use (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.89), reported infidelity (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.02 to 3.49) and age at first sex (coefficient -0.48, 95% CI -0.96 to -0.01) in 2016. The impact of acquaintance on survey responses changed over time for any contraceptive use (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.33 to 3.30).

Conclusions: The standard in many large-scale surveys is to use interviewers from outside the community. Our results show that interviewer-respondent acquaintance is associated with a range of family planning outcomes; therefore, we recommend that the approach to hiring interviewers be examined and reconsidered in survey data collection efforts.

Keywords: family planning; interviewer effects; survey methodology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. Groves RM. Research on survey data quality. Public Opin Q 1987;51:S156–72. 10.1093/poq/51.4_PART_2.S156 - DOI
    1. West BT, Blom AG. Explaining interviewer effects: a research synthesis. J Surv Stat Methodol 2017;5:175–211. 10.1093/jssam/smw024 - DOI
    1. Bignami-Van Assche S, Reniers G, Weinreb AA. An assessment of the KDICP and MDICP data quality: interviewer effects, question reliability and sample attrition. Demogr Res 2003;1:31–76.
    1. Anglewicz P, Adams J, Obare F, et al. . The Malawi diffusion and ideational change project 2004-06: data collection, data quality, and analysis of attrition. Demogr Res 2009;20:503. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blohm M, Hox J, Koch A. The influence of interviewers' contact behavior on the contact and cooperation rate in face-to-face household surveys. Int J Public Opin Res 2006;19:97–111. 10.1093/ijpor/edh120 - DOI

Publication types

MeSH terms