Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb 5;116(6):2290-2299.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1816278116. Epub 2019 Jan 22.

Distinction of self-produced touch and social touch at cortical and spinal cord levels

Affiliations

Distinction of self-produced touch and social touch at cortical and spinal cord levels

Rebecca Boehme et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Differentiation between self-produced tactile stimuli and touch by others is necessary for social interactions and for a coherent concept of "self." The mechanisms underlying this distinction are unknown. Here, we investigated the distinction between self- and other-produced light touch in healthy volunteers using three different approaches: fMRI, behavioral testing, and somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) at spinal and cortical levels. Using fMRI, we found self-other differentiation in somatosensory and sociocognitive areas. Other-touch was related to activation in several areas, including somatosensory cortex, insula, superior temporal gyrus, supramarginal gyrus, striatum, amygdala, cerebellum, and prefrontal cortex. During self-touch, we instead found deactivation in insula, anterior cingulate cortex, superior temporal gyrus, amygdala, parahippocampal gyrus, and prefrontal areas. Deactivation extended into brain areas encoding low-level sensory representations, including thalamus and brainstem. These findings were replicated in a second cohort. During self-touch, the sensorimotor cortex was functionally connected to the insula, and the threshold for detection of an additional tactile stimulus was elevated. Differential encoding of self- vs. other-touch during fMRI correlated with the individual self-concept strength. In SEP, cortical amplitudes were reduced during self-touch, while latencies at cortical and spinal levels were faster for other-touch. We thus demonstrated a robust self-other distinction in brain areas related to somatosensory, social cognitive, and interoceptive processing. Signs of this distinction were evident at the spinal cord. Our results provide a framework for future studies in autism, schizophrenia, and emotionally unstable personality disorder, conditions where symptoms include social touch avoidance and poor self-vs.-other discrimination.

Keywords: affective touch; self-concept; self-touch; sensorimotor integration; sensory attenuation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Distinct BOLD signal during social touch and self-touch. (Top) Other-touch activated areas involved in social cognition, display of slices [53 −18 14]. (Bottom) Self-touch deactivated a widespread network of areas, display of slices [47 46 15]. Both thresholded at P < 0.05; FWE-corrected at the whole brain level; cluster size > 20.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Differential encoding of other-touch and self-touch. (Top) A widespread network showed higher activation for other-touch than for self-touch, display of slices [44 15 69], cluster size > 20. (Bottom) Conjunction of activation during other-touch and deactivation during self-touch. Display of slices [6 −6 12], cluster size > 5. Both thresholded at P < 0.05; FWE-corrected at the whole brain level.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Parameter estimates for regions involved in processing tactile sensory information differ for the three conditions. Other-touch by the experimenter (blue), self-touch (green), and object-touch (brown); main effect of condition [F(22, 136) = 18.4, P < 0.0005, Wilks’ Λ = 0.063]. Error bars represent the SE. aI, anterior insula; BR, brainstem; l, left; pI, posterior insula; r, right; thal, thalamus.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Detection thresholds for von Frey filaments during four conditions: baseline (no additional touch stimulation), self-touch, other-touch, and object-touch. The plot indicates mean (midline), 95% confidence interval (dark box), one SD (light box), and individual data points. The small plot indicates individual values for each subject during other-touch and self-touch.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Amplitude and latency of SEPs differs between other-touch and self-touch. (Left, A) Amplitudes at the cortical level (C3/4 and CZ) were higher for other-touch than for self-touch. (Left, B) Latencies at the cortical level (C3/4) and at the cervical level were shorter for other-touch than for self-touch. Gray indicates no touch stimulation; blue, other-touch; green, self-touch; brown, object-touch. Error bars indicate SE. (Right) Line plots depicting individual values for self-touch and other-touch. *P < 0.05.

References

    1. Blanke O. Multisensory brain mechanisms of bodily self-consciousness. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012;13:556–571. - PubMed
    1. Lejeune F, et al. The manual habituation and discrimination of shapes in preterm human infants from 33 to 34+6 post-conceptional age. PLoS One. 2010;5:e9108. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Castiello U, et al. Wired to be social: The ontogeny of human interaction. PLoS One. 2010;5:e13199. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hooker D. The origin of the grasping movement in man. Proc Am Philos Soc. 1938;79:597–606.
    1. Schütz-Bosbach S, Musil JJ, Haggard P. Touchant-touché: The role of self-touch in the representation of body structure. Conscious Cogn. 2009;18:2–11. - PubMed

Publication types