Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jan 8:11:1756287218813787.
doi: 10.1177/1756287218813787. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.

Anatomical, surgical and technical factors influencing continence after radical prostatectomy

Affiliations
Review

Anatomical, surgical and technical factors influencing continence after radical prostatectomy

Carlos Arroyo et al. Ther Adv Urol. .

Abstract

Radical prostatectomy (RP) is the most frequent treatment with curative intent performed for prostate cancer to date. Different surgical approaches (perineal, transperitoneal, and extraperitoneal) and techniques (laparoscopic and robot assisted) have been described to increase the efficiency and potentially diminish the postoperative complications of this procedure. The aim of this narrative review is to investigate and define the factors that influence postprostatectomy urinary continence. We highlighted the anatomical landmarks and the modifications of surgical techniques aimed at improving the continence rates and thus, patient quality of life. After RP, the long-term continence rates range from 84% to 97%. In order to achieve good continence rates, a careful dissection along with meticulous anatomical reconstruction is required. To this end, a detailed knowledge of the periprostatic anatomy is mandatory.

Keywords: laparoscopic radical prostatectomy; radical prostatectomy; radical prostatectomy complications; robot assisted radical prostatectomy; secondary incontinence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Patel VR, Sivaraman A, Coelho RF, et al. Pentafecta: a new concept for reporting outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2011; 59: 702–707. - PubMed
    1. Xu AJ, Taksler GB, Llukani E, et al. Long-term continence outcomes in men undergoing radical prostatectomy: a prospective 15-year longitudinal study. J Urol. Epub ahead of print 7 May 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro2018.05.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoyland K, Vasdev N, Abrof A, et al. Post-radical prostatectomy incontinence: etiology and prevention. Rev Urol 2014; 16: 181–188. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lavigueur-Blouin H, Noriega AC, Valdivieso R, et al. Predictors of early continence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Can Urol Assoc J 2015; 9: e93–e97. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nandipati KC, Raina R, Agarwal A, et al. Nerve-sparing surgery significantly affects long-term continence after radical prostatectomy. Urology 2007; 70: 1127–1130. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources