Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun;93(2):241-257.
doi: 10.1111/papt.12217. Epub 2019 Jan 22.

Exploring the implementation of cognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis using the Normalization Process Theory framework

Affiliations
Free article

Exploring the implementation of cognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis using the Normalization Process Theory framework

Nikos Xanidis et al. Psychol Psychother. 2020 Jun.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: Evidence suggests that only a minority of service users experiencing psychosis have access to Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for psychosis (CBTp). Normalization Process Theory (NPT) is a theoretical framework which focuses on processes by which interventions are implemented and normalized in clinical practice. This study explored the views and experiences of mental health professionals regarding the implementation of CBTp. Barriers and facilitators to implementation were explored using the NPT framework.

Design: A qualitative methodology was adopted involving semi-structured focus groups and individual interviews.

Methods: A total of 14 members of staff working in the community and crisis mental health teams were recruited. Thematic analysis was used to generate initial themes. The framework approach was utilized to map initial themes to the NPT framework.

Results: Inductive coding generated five overarching themes consisting of 15 individual subthemes which captured the perceived barriers to engagement; contextual barriers to implementation; optimization of implementation; positive attitudes towards implementation; and expectations of implementing CBTp. All but two subthemes mapped on to the NPT framework. The deductive analysis suggested that difficulties in making sense of CBTp among professionals were reflected as service level barriers which impeded wider implementation.

Conclusion: The results of this study suggested a mixture of barriers and facilitators to CBTp implementation. Interpreting our findings within an NPT framework indicates the importance of strong clinical leadership to address difficulties in sense-making and service investment in CBTp.

Practitioner points: Findings indicate a mixture of barriers and facilitators to CBTp implementation. NPT analysis indicates difficulties in coherence among stakeholders regarding the purpose and value of CBTp. Difficulties making sense of CBTp translates into service level barriers and impede the collective action of stakeholders. The role of clinical leadership is crucial in increasing coherence and collective action in services.

Keywords: barriers; cognitive behaviour therapy; cognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis; experiences; facilitators; implementation; implementation framework; mental health professionals; normalisation process theory; psychosis; views.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Berry, K., & Haddock, G. (2008). The implementation of the NICE guidelines for schizophrenia: Barriers to the implementation of psychological interventions and recommendations for the future. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 81, 419-436. https://doi.org/10.1348/147608308X329540
    1. Berry, C., & Hayward, M. (2011). What can qualitative research tell us about service user perspectives of CBT for psychosis? A synthesis of current evidence. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 39, 487-494. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465811000154
    1. Braehler, C., & Harper, S. F. (2008). Identifying psychological needs in psychosis: Perceptions and priorities of CMHT key workers. Clinical Psychology Forum, 182, 13-17.
    1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    1. Danermark, B., Ekström, M., Jakobsen, L., & Karlsson, J. C. (2002). Explaining society: Critical realism in the social sciences. Oxford, UK: Routledge.

MeSH terms