Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar;27(3):420-426.
doi: 10.1002/oby.22389. Epub 2019 Jan 22.

Objective versus Self-Reported Energy Intake Changes During Low-Carbohydrate and Low-Fat Diets

Affiliations

Objective versus Self-Reported Energy Intake Changes During Low-Carbohydrate and Low-Fat Diets

Juen Guo et al. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2019 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare self-reported with objective measurements of energy intake changes (∆EI) during a 1-year weight-loss intervention with subjects randomized to low-carbohydrate versus low-fat diets.

Methods: Repeated body weight measurements were used as inputs to an objective mathematical model to calculate ∆EIModel and to compare with self-reported energy intake changes assessed by repeated 24-hour recalls (∆EIRecall ).

Results: ∆EIRecall indicated a relatively persistent state of calorie restriction of ~500 to 600 kcal/d at 3, 6, and 12 months with no significant differences between the diets. ∆EIModel demonstrated large early decreases in calorie intake > 800 kcal/d followed by an exponential return to ~100 kcal/d below baseline at the end of the year. Accounting for self-reported physical activities did not materially affect the results. Discrepancies between ∆EIModel and ∆EIRecall became progressively greater over time. The low-carbohydrate diet resulted in ∆EIModel that was 162 ± 53 kcal/d lower than the low-fat diet over the first 3 months (P = 0.002), but no significant diet differences were found thereafter.

Conclusions: Self-reported ∆EI measurements were inaccurate. Model-based calculations of ∆EI found that instructions to follow the low-carbohydrate diet resulted in greater calorie restriction than the low-fat diet in the early phases of the intervention, but these diet differences were not sustained.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01826591.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest disclosure statement: None of the authors have conflicts of interest

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
A) Mean body weight changes measured during the DIETFITS trial clinic visits (●) or self-reported by subjects at group counseling sessions (○) for all 414 subjects with complete clinic weight data. B) Mean self-reported energy intake changes (■) indicated a relatively persistent reduction in energy intake whereas the model-based measurements (○ from self-reported weights and ● from clinic weights) followed an exponential time course (solid curve). Error bars indicate 95% CI.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
A) Mean body weight changes for the 209 subjects in the low-carbohydrate diet group (♦ clinic and ◊ self-reported) and B) the 205 subjects in the low-fat (▲clinic and Δ self-reported) diet group. C) Mean model-based measurements of energy intake changes in the low-carbohydrate diet group (▲ from clinic weights and Δ from self-reported weights ) and the low-fat diet group (◊ from self-reported weights and ♦ from clinic weights) both followed an exponential time courses (solid curve and dashed curve for low-carbohydrate and low-fat diets, respectively). * indicates p<0.05 between diet groups and the error bars indicate 95% CI.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Individual weight changes at 12 months for subjects assigned to the low-fat diet (left column) and low-carbohydrate diet (right column) were significantly correlated with model-calculated changes in energy intake averaged over A) 6–12 months; B) 3–6 months; and C) 0–3 months.

References

    1. Schoeller DA. How accurate is self-reported dietary energy intake? Nutr Rev 1990;48: 373–379. - PubMed
    1. Sanghvi A, Redman LA, Martin CK, Ravussin E, Hall KD. Validation of an inexpensive and accurate mathematical method to measure long-term changes in free-living energy intake. Am J Clin Nutr 2015;102: 353–358. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gardner CD, Trepanowski JF, Del Gobbo LC, et al. Effect of low-fat vs low-carbohydrate diet on 12-month weight loss in overweight adults and the association with genotype pattern or insulin secretion: The dietfits randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2018;319: 667–679. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stanton MV, Robinson JL, Kirkpatrick SM, Farzinkhou S, Avery EC, Rigdon J, et al. DIETFITS study (diet intervention examining the factors interacting with treatment success) - Study design and methods. Contemporary clinical trials 2017;53: 151–161. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sallis JF, Haskell WL, Wood PD, Fortmann SP, Rogers T, Blair SN, et al. Physical activity assessment methodology in the Five-City Project. American journal of epidemiology 1985;121: 91–106. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources