Commentary on: Glaucoma drainage devices: Boon or bane
- PMID: 30672477
- PMCID: PMC6376842
- DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1234_18
Commentary on: Glaucoma drainage devices: Boon or bane
Conflict of interest statement
None
Comment on
-
Intermediate-term outcome of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant.Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019 Feb;67(2):233-238. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_675_18. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019. PMID: 30672476 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ramulu PY, Corcoran KJ, Corcoran SL, Robin AL. Utilization of various glaucoma surgeries and procedures in Medicare beneficiaries from 1995 to 2004. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:2265–70. - PubMed
-
- Desai MA, Gedde SJ, Feuer WJ, Shi W, Chen PP, Parrish RK., 2nd Practice preferences for glaucoma surgery: A survey of the American Glaucoma Society in 2008. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2011;42:202–8. - PubMed
-
- Roy S, Ravinet E, Mermoud A. Baerveldt implant in refractory glaucoma: Long-term results and factors influencing outcome. Int Ophthalmol. 2001;2:93–100. - PubMed
-
- Kaushik S, Kataria P, Raj S, Pandav SS, Ram J. Safety and efficacy of a low-cost glaucoma drainage device for refractory childhood glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101:1623–7. - PubMed
-
- Budenz DL Gedde SJ, Brandt JD, David K, Feuer WM, Larsen E. Baerveldt glaucoma implant in the management of refractory childhood glaucomas. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:2204–10. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
