An investigation into the accuracy of using serum creatinine estimated glomerular filtration rate to predict measured glomerular filtration rate
- PMID: 30672871
- DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000980
An investigation into the accuracy of using serum creatinine estimated glomerular filtration rate to predict measured glomerular filtration rate
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of the study was to identify a threshold value of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) that would predict a measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) of ≤25 ml/min/1.73 m. This is to guide use of the new British Nuclear Medicine Society guidelines, which specifies a 24 h sample for patients with a GFR of ≤25 ml/min/1.73 m, when using the single-sample (SS) method.
Patients and methods: Data from 1956 patient studies were used to calculate values for the GFR using the slope intercept (SI) method and SS , which was taken 210 min after injection. A sub-data set of 241 patients was taken with patients having an mGFR of ≤80 ml/min/1.73 m by the SS or SI method and an eGFR value within 28 days of the mGFR. The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation was used to calculate the eGFR. Receiver operator characteristic curves comparing the sensitivity and specificity of using the eGFR to predict values of the mGFR were used to find a threshold value for the eGFR.
Results: There is a large variation in the accuracy of using the eGFR to predict the mGFR value. The mean difference for the SI method is -2%, with an absolute percentage difference of 22% and a range of -121 to 63%. The SS method has a mean percentage difference of -1%, absolute percentage difference of 23% and a range of -153 to 86%.From the receiver operator characteristic graphs, an eGFR value of 40 ml/min/1.73 m was chosen to maximise the sensitivity of the eGFR threshold value used to predict an mGFR value of ≤25 ml/min/1.73 m.
Conclusion: The eGFR value has a high error when used for predicting the mGFR. Therefore, the study recommends that an eGFR threshold value of ≤40 ml/min/1.73 m is used to predict mGFRs of ≤25 ml/min/1.73 m in order to optimise the likelihood of identifying all such patients.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of Performance of Improved Serum Estimators of Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) to 99mTc-DTPA GFR Methods in Patients with Hepatic Cirrhosis.J Nucl Med Technol. 2017 Mar;45(1):42-49. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.116.180851. Epub 2017 Feb 2. J Nucl Med Technol. 2017. PMID: 28154020 Free PMC article.
-
Utility of the Japanese Glomerular Filtration Rate Equation in Estimating Glomerular Filtration Rate of Donor Kidney.Transplant Proc. 2016 Apr;48(3):734-7. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.12.118. Transplant Proc. 2016. PMID: 27234724
-
Variability of estimated glomerular filtration rate and 99m Tc-DTPA glomerular filtration rate: implications for a single time-point sampling regime.Nucl Med Commun. 2023 May 1;44(5):351-357. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001674. Epub 2023 Feb 27. Nucl Med Commun. 2023. PMID: 36826407 Free PMC article.
-
Improving the clinical value of estimating glomerular filtration rate by reporting all values: a contrarian viewpoint.Nephron Clin Pract. 2010;115(3):c177-81. doi: 10.1159/000313030. Epub 2010 Apr 23. Nephron Clin Pract. 2010. PMID: 20413994 Review.
-
Glomerular filtration rate: when to measure and in which patients?Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2019 Dec 1;34(12):2001-2007. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfy363. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2019. PMID: 30520986 Review.
Cited by
-
A neural network approach to glomerular filtration rate estimation: a single-centre retrospective audit.Nucl Med Commun. 2025 Jul 1;46(7):620-628. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001982. Epub 2025 Apr 7. Nucl Med Commun. 2025. PMID: 40223657 Free PMC article.
-
Tailoring the sampling time of single-sample GFR measurement according to expected renal function: a multisite audit.EJNMMI Phys. 2022 Oct 26;9(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s40658-022-00500-z. EJNMMI Phys. 2022. PMID: 36289135 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous