Focus groups and other methods for increased effectiveness of community intervention--a review
- PMID: 3067291
Focus groups and other methods for increased effectiveness of community intervention--a review
Abstract
In the evaluation of community intervention program both quantitative and qualitative methods are essential for analysis of effectiveness and impact. Evaluation of such programs is affected by unique theoretical, conceptual, methodological, analytical and political impediments. In this article different methods are briefly reviewed. Among these are survey methods, focus groups and related interview methods, ethnographic and other qualitative methods. In Orebro, a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods has been used in the planning of community intervention with two suburban areas. The quantitative approach was used to prioritize between different problems and intervention areas. The planning and implementation of the intervention were based on qualitative studies. Professionals, local citizens and the researchers cooperated in these action oriented research projects.
Similar articles
-
The study of client-provider interactions: a review of methodological issues.Stud Fam Plann. 1994 Jan-Feb;25(1):1-17. Stud Fam Plann. 1994. PMID: 8209391 Review.
-
Methods for exploring implementation variation and local context within a cluster randomised community intervention trial.J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Sep;58(9):788-93. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.014415. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004. PMID: 15310806 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Community-based health promotion--a challenge for the evaluation].Gesundheitswesen. 2007 Feb;69(2):77-87. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-970146. Gesundheitswesen. 2007. PMID: 17405079 German.
-
Realistic outcomes: lessons from community-based research and demonstration programs for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases.J Public Health Policy. 1993 Winter;14(4):437-62. J Public Health Policy. 1993. PMID: 8163634 Review.
-
Application of qualitative methods in program planning for health promotion interventions.Health Promot Pract. 2006 Apr;7(2):234-42. doi: 10.1177/1524839905278915. Health Promot Pract. 2006. PMID: 16585146
Cited by
-
Underrepresented in medicine students' perspectives on impactful medical education.BMC Med Educ. 2022 Dec 30;22(1):904. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03983-7. BMC Med Educ. 2022. PMID: 36585706 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring nurses' experiences of social media and in-person educational interventions for professional development: a qualitative study.BMC Nurs. 2022 May 24;21(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00903-4. BMC Nurs. 2022. PMID: 35610638 Free PMC article.
-
Using resident focus groups to improve subspecialty consultations in a pediatric urgent care setting.J Natl Med Assoc. 2006 Sep;98(9):1478-82. J Natl Med Assoc. 2006. PMID: 17019915 Free PMC article.
-
Incorporating Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) knowledge and skills into the daily work of police officers: a focus group study.Community Ment Health J. 2008 Dec;44(6):427-32. doi: 10.1007/s10597-008-9145-8. Epub 2008 May 9. Community Ment Health J. 2008. PMID: 18465226
-
Medical community involvement in a breast cancer screening promotional project.Public Health Rep. 1994 Jul-Aug;109(4):491-9. Public Health Rep. 1994. PMID: 8041848 Free PMC article.