Analysis of FFR Measurement Clinical Impact and Cost-Effectiveness Compared to Angiography In Multi-Arterial Patients Undergoing PCI
- PMID: 30673015
- PMCID: PMC6317620
- DOI: 10.5935/abc.20180261
Analysis of FFR Measurement Clinical Impact and Cost-Effectiveness Compared to Angiography In Multi-Arterial Patients Undergoing PCI
Comment on
-
Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of FFR Compared with Angiography in Multivessel Disease Patient.Arq Bras Cardiol. 2019 Jan;112(1):40-47. doi: 10.5935/abc.20180262. Epub 2018 Dec 17. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2019. PMID: 30570071 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Zimmermann FM, Ferrara A, Johnson NP, van Nunen LX, Escaned J, Albertsson P, et al. Deferral vs: performance of percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally non-significant coronary stenosis: 15-year follow-up of the DEFER trial. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(45):3182–3188. - PubMed
-
- van Nunen LX, Zimmermann FM, Tonino PAL, Barbato E, Baumbach A, Engstrøm T, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guidance of PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (FAME): 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386(10006):1853–1860. - PubMed
-
- Xaplanteris P, Fournier S, Pijls NHJ, Fearon WF, Barbato E, Tonino PAL, et al. Five-Year Outcomes with PCI Guided by Fractional Flow Reserve. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(3):250–259. - PubMed
-
- Sant'Anna FM, da Silva ER, Batista LA, Brito MB, Ventura FM, Ferraz HA, et al. What is the angiography error when defining myocardial ischemia during percutaneous coronary interventions? Arq Bras Cardiol. 2008;91(3):162-7, 179-84. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous