Grapevine Trunk Diseases: A Review of Fifteen Years of Trials for Their Control with Chemicals and Biocontrol Agents
- PMID: 30673583
- DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-08-17-1181-FE
Grapevine Trunk Diseases: A Review of Fifteen Years of Trials for Their Control with Chemicals and Biocontrol Agents
Abstract
Grapevine trunk diseases (GTDs) represent one of the most important problems for viticulture worldwide. Beyond the original causes of this outbreak in some countries like France, the lack of efficient control protocols and the prohibition of using active ingredients such as sodium arsenite and benzimidazoles, until recently used to reduce the impact of some GTDs but deleterious for humans and the environment, have probably worsened the impact of the diseases, leading to increasing economic losses. Since 1990, searches have been made to find efficient tools to control GTDs, testing a wide range of active ingredients and biocontrol agents. This review provides readers with an overview of the results reported in the scientific literature over the last 15 years. In particular, the review focuses on the trials carried out applying chemicals or microorganisms to control Esca complex diseases, Botryosphaeria dieback, and Eutypa dieback, the most widespread GTDs.
Similar articles
-
Vitis Methods to Understand and Develop Strategies for Diagnosis and Sustainable Control of Grapevine Trunk Diseases.Phytopathology. 2019 Jun;109(6):916-931. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-09-18-0349-RVW. Epub 2019 May 6. Phytopathology. 2019. PMID: 30852973 Review.
-
Isolation and Reproductive Structures Induction of Fungal Pathogens Associated with Xylem and Wood Necrosis in Grapevine.Methods Mol Biol. 2024;2722:107-115. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3477-6_8. Methods Mol Biol. 2024. PMID: 37897603
-
A characterization of grapevine trunk diseases in France from data generated by the National Grapevine Wood Diseases Survey.Phytopathology. 2008 May;98(5):571-9. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-98-5-0571. Phytopathology. 2008. PMID: 18943225
-
Toxicity of extracellular proteins from Diplodia seriata and Neofusicoccum parvum involved in grapevine Botryosphaeria dieback.Protoplasma. 2015 Mar;252(2):679-87. doi: 10.1007/s00709-014-0716-y. Epub 2014 Oct 17. Protoplasma. 2015. PMID: 25323623
-
Managing Grapevine Trunk Diseases With Respect to Etiology and Epidemiology: Current Strategies and Future Prospects.Plant Dis. 2018 Jan;102(1):12-39. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-04-17-0512-FE. Epub 2017 Dec 7. Plant Dis. 2018. PMID: 30673457 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of the Molecular Responses of Tolerant, Susceptible and Highly Susceptible Grapevine Cultivars During Interaction With the Pathogenic Fungus Eutypa lata.Front Plant Sci. 2019 Jul 30;10:991. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00991. eCollection 2019. Front Plant Sci. 2019. PMID: 31428114 Free PMC article.
-
High Genetic Diversity and Species Complexity of Diaporthe Associated With Grapevine Dieback in China.Front Microbiol. 2019 Sep 2;10:1936. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01936. eCollection 2019. Front Microbiol. 2019. PMID: 31543868 Free PMC article.
-
Hunting modulators of plant defence: the grapevine trunk disease fungus Eutypa lata secretes an amplifier for plant basal immunity.J Exp Bot. 2020 Jun 22;71(12):3710-3724. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraa152. J Exp Bot. 2020. PMID: 32211774 Free PMC article.
-
Belowground microbiota analysis indicates that Fusarium spp. exacerbate grapevine trunk disease.Environ Microbiome. 2023 Apr 3;18(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40793-023-00490-0. Environ Microbiome. 2023. PMID: 37013554 Free PMC article.
-
Pruning Wound Protection Products Induce Alterations in the Wood Mycobiome Profile of Grapevines.J Fungi (Basel). 2023 Apr 19;9(4):488. doi: 10.3390/jof9040488. J Fungi (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37108942 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources