Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Jan 23;14(1):e0210997.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210997. eCollection 2019.

Clinical performance of Anyplex II HPV28 by human papillomavirus type and viral load in a referral population

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Clinical performance of Anyplex II HPV28 by human papillomavirus type and viral load in a referral population

Ingrid Baasland et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Anyplex II HPV28 (`Anyplex`) is a semi-quantitative DNA PCR assay divided into set A, comprising 14 high risk (hr)HPV types; and set B, comprising 5 possibly hrHPV types and 9 low risk (lr)HPV types. We compared the ability of Anyplex to that of Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) and PreTect HPV-Proofer (`Proofer`) to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade two or worse (CIN2+) by HPV types and viral load. This cross-sectional study included 296 women referred to colposcopy with abnormal cervical cytology and/or persistent HPV infection. CIN2+ was identified in 175/296 women. Liquid based cytology samples were used to perform HPV testing. The sensitivity of Anyplex to detect CIN2+ was 98.9% (95% CI 95.9-99.9) and specificity 43.0% (95% CI 34.0-52.3). Restricting to medium and high viral loads in Anyplex set A, sensitivity and specificity were 97.1% (95% CI 93.5-99.1) and 59.5% (95% CI 50.2-68.3) with positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) 77.6% and 93.5%, respectively, comparable to HC2. Restricting Anyplex to the hrHPV types in Proofer, HPV16, 18, 31, 33 and 45, sensitivity and specificity for CIN2+ were 85.1% (95% CI 79.0-90.1) and 71.1% (95% CI 62.1-79.0), comparable to Proofer`s. When adding HPV52 and 58, the sensitivity for CIN2+ was 92.6% (95% CI 87.6-96.0) and CIN3+ 96.5% (95% CI 92.0-98.8). No value of Anyplex set B was found in detecting CIN2+. In conclusion, the clinical performance of medium and high viral loads in Anyplex set A was comparable to HC2. Restricting the test to the 7 hrHPV types included in the 9-valent HPV-vaccine, HPV16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52 and 58, satisfies the international criteria for cervical cancer screening with relative sensitivity compared to HC2 for CIN2+ and CIN3+ of 0.98 and 1.01, respectively. Detecting all 28 Anyplex HPV types adds no benefit in a referral population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flow chart of the study.
*Norwegian guidelines for histological examination were persistent low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance+high-risk HPV, persistent high-risk HPV-positive cervical smears, atypical squamous cells, cannot rule out a high-grade lesion, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and adenocarcinoma in situ. Abbreviations: HPV: human papillomavirus, HC2: hybrid capture 2.
Fig 2
Fig 2. HPV distribution according to histology.
Abbreviations: HPV: human papillomavirus, NILM: negative for intraepithelial lesion and malignancy, CIN1: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1, CIN2: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2, CIN3: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3, ACIS: adenocarcinoma in situ.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. IARC. Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, vol 100B, p. 255–296 Lyon: IARC; 2012 [cited 2018 03.09.]. https://monographs.iarc.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/mono100B-11.pdf.
    1. Lie AK, Trope A, Skare GB, Bjorge T, Jonassen CM, Brusegard K, et al. HPV genotype profile in a Norwegian cohort with ASC-US and LSIL cytology with three year cumulative risk of high grade cervical neoplasia. Gynecologic oncology. 2018;148(1):111–7. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.10.031 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cuzick J, Wheeler C. Need for expanded HPV genotyping for cervical screening. Papillomavirus research (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 2016;2:112–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meijer CJ, Berkhof H, Heideman DA, Hesselink AT, Snijders PJ. Validation of high-risk HPV tests for primary cervical screening. J Clin Virol. 2009;46 Suppl 3:S1–4. - PubMed
    1. Meijer CJ, Berkhof J, Castle PE, Hesselink AT, Franco EL, Ronco G, et al. Guidelines for human papillomavirus DNA test requirements for primary cervical cancer screening in women 30 years and older. International journal of cancer. 2009;124(3):516–20. 10.1002/ijc.24010 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms