Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Jan 23;19(1):61.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-3871-1.

Psychometric properties of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care measure (PACIC-5A) among patients with obesity

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Psychometric properties of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care measure (PACIC-5A) among patients with obesity

Maria Schwenke et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: The Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC-5A) was developed to assess the satisfaction with patient-provider interaction based on the Chronic Care Model. The additional 5A approach (assess, advise, agree, assist, arrange) allows to score behavioral counseling. The aim of the study was to assess the psychometric properties of the German adaptation of the PACIC-5A questionnaire in a sample of general practitioners (GP) patients with obesity.

Methods: Analyses were based on data from the study "Five A's counseling in weight management of obese patients in primary care: a cluster randomized controlled trial (INTERACT)". Data were collected via standardized questionnaires containing the 26-item version of the PACIC-5A questionnaire. A total of 117 patients with obesity were included in the analyses. Statistical procedures comprised descriptive analyses, the calculation of Cronbach's alpha, test-retest analyses and factor analyses in order to assess the psychometric properties including reliability and validity of the PACIC-5A.

Results: The patient's mean age was 43.4 years and the sample was mostly female (59%). Middle educational level was found for the majority (78%) and the mean Body Mass Index was 38.9 kg/m2. Descriptive analyses revealed a mean PACIC score of 2.33 and 5A sum score of 2.29. Notable floor effects were found. PACIC-5A showed high level of internal consistency (Cronbach's alphas > 0.9) and exploratory factor analyses resulted in a unidimensional structure.

Conclusion: The results of this study provide evidence regarding the psychometric properties of the German version of the PACIC-5A used in a sample of GP patients with obesity and make an important contribution to the reliable and valid assessment of the patient-GP interaction with regard to obesity counseling in primary care.

Keywords: 5A counseling; Obesity; PACIC; Primary care; Reliability; Validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The ethics committee of the University of Leipzig has approved this study (AZ.: 248–15-13,072,015). The study was performed in accordance with the Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP), the Declaration of Helsinki in its latest version and international and local laws. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to enrolment in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of the sample selection
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Test-retest scatterplot of (a) PACIC and (b) 5A with T0 baseline measurement and T1 6-month measurement
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Parallel analyses of (a) PACIC (20 items) and (b) 5A (25 items)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WHO. Obesity and overweight; 2016. Available: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/. Accessed 16 June 2018.
    1. WHO . Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
    1. Wagner EH, Austin BT, von Korff M. Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. Milbank Q. 1996;74:511–544. doi: 10.2307/3350391. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Davis C, Hindmarsh M, Schaefer J, Bonomi A. Improving chronic illness care. Translating evidence into action. Health Aff (Millwood) 2001;20:64–78. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.20.6.64. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Glasgow RE, Wagner EH, Schaefer J, Mahoney LD, Reid RJ, Greene SM. Development and validation of the patient assessment of chronic illness care (PACIC) Med Care. 2005;43:436–444. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000160375.47920.8c. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types