Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 14;81(3):383-388.
doi: 10.1292/jvms.18-0436. Epub 2019 Jan 22.

Antiviral effects against influenza A virus infection by a short hairpin RNA targeting the non-coding terminal region of the viral nucleoprotein gene

Affiliations

Antiviral effects against influenza A virus infection by a short hairpin RNA targeting the non-coding terminal region of the viral nucleoprotein gene

Yoshikazu Fujimoto et al. J Vet Med Sci. .

Abstract

RNA interference (RNAi) can inhibit Influenza A virus (IAV) infection in a gene-specific manner. In this study, we constructed a transgene expressing a short hairpin RNA (shRNA) that targets the noncoding region of the IAV RNA gene encoding nucleoprotein (NP). To investigate the antiviral effects of the shRNA, we generated two transgenic mouse lines with this transgene. Unfortunately, there was no apparent difference in IAV resistance between transgenic and non-transgenic littermates. To further investigate the antiviral effects of the shRNA, we prepared mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) from transgenic and non-transgenic mice. In experimental infections using these MEFs, virus production of mouse-adapted IAV strain A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (PR8) in the transgenic MEFs was suppressed by means of the down-regulation of the viral RNA gene transcription in the early stages of infection in comparison with non-transgenic MEFs. These results indicated that expression of the shRNA was able to confer antiviral properties against IAVs to MEFs, although the effects were limited. Our findings suggest that the shRNA targeting the noncoding region of the viral RNA (vRNA) of NP might be a supporting tool in developing influenza-resistant poultry.

Keywords: RNA interference; antiviral effect; influenza A virus; short hairpin RNA; transgenic mouse.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Schematic representation of the shRNA expression vector. This vector includes a β-actin promoter driving shRNA expression. The arrows denote the PCR primers used to identify transgene integration in the transgenic mice.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Experimental infections in transgenic mice expressing shRNA. Transgenic (TG) and non-transgenic (non-TG) mice were challenged intranasally with IAV strain PR8. Mice body weight during the challenge phase (14 days) was calculated relative to their starting body weight. Error bars indicate standard deviation.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Viral replication in transgenic mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) expressing shRNA. MEFs were infected with PR8 at an MOI of 0.01. The culture supernatants were collected at 8 and 24 hr post-inoculation for virus titration in MDCK cells. The mean values of the virus titers were determined in triplicate. Error bars indicate standard deviation. MEF cell lines A–D and F–H were prepared from transgenic mouse embryos of lines 6522 and 6837, respectively. MEF cell lines E, I, and J were prepared from non-transgenic mouse embryos. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test, and * indicates P<0.01; significant differences in transgenic MEFs versus non-transgenic MEFs (A–D vs. E in cell line 6522, F–H vs. I in cell line 6837).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Expression levels of a viral gene in transgenic MEFs expressing shRNA after infection with strain PR8. Total RNA was extracted from MEFs infected with PR8 at an MOI of 0.01 after 8 and 24 hr post-inoculation. To determine the expression level of mRNA gene of the viral NP, reverse transcription and semi-quantitative real-time PCR were carried out. The results are presented in relative value to the expression level in non-transgenic MEFs (cell lines E and I for transgenic lines 6522 and 6837, respectively), and error bars represent the mean ± SEM of duplicate experiments. MEF cell lines A–D and F–H were prepared from transgenic mouse embryos of lines 6522 and 6837, respectively. MEF cell lines E, I, and J were prepared from non-transgenic mouse embryos. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test, and * indicates P<0.01; significant differences in transgenic MEFs versus non-transgenic MEFs (A–D vs. E in cell line 6522, F–H vs. I in cell line 6837).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Betáková T., Svančarová P.2013. Role and application of RNA interference in replication of influenza viruses. Acta Virol. 57: 97–104. doi: 10.4149/av_2013_02_97 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fodor E., Pritlove D. C., Brownlee G. G.1995. Characterization of the RNA-fork model of virion RNA in the initiation of transcription in influenza A virus. J. Virol. 69: 4012–4019. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fujimoto Y., Tomioka Y., Takakuwa H., Uechi G., Yabuta T., Ozaki K., Suyama H., Yamamoto S., Morimatsu M., Mai Q., Yamashiro T., Ito T., Otsuki K., Ono E.2016. Cross-protective potential of anti-nucleoprotein human monoclonal antibodies against lethal influenza A virus infection. J. Gen. Virol. 97: 2104–2116. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.000518 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fujimoto Y., Ozaki K., Maeda M., Nishijima K., Takakuwa H., Otsuki K., Kida H., Ono E.2013. Resistance to influenza A virus infection in transformed cell lines expressing an anti-PB2 monoclonal antibody. Vet. J. 198: 487–493. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.09.019 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ge Q., McManus M. T., Nguyen T., Shen C. H., Sharp P. A., Eisen H. N., Chen J.2003. RNA interference of influenza virus production by directly targeting mRNA for degradation and indirectly inhibiting all viral RNA transcription. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100: 2718–2723. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0437841100 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms