Comparison of Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes Between Self-Locking Stand-Alone Cage and Cage with Anterior Plate for Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 30677575
- DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.218
Comparison of Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes Between Self-Locking Stand-Alone Cage and Cage with Anterior Plate for Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Objective: This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the therapeutic effects in clinical and radiologic outcomes of a self-locking stand-alone cage (SSC) and cage-with-plate (CP) for multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).
Methods: A systematic search was performed for all comparative studies reported up to August 2018. Operative time, hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss, Japanese Orthopedic Association score, Neck Disability Index (NDI), cervical and segmental Cobb angle, intervertebral height, fusion rate, incidence of subsidence, dysphagia, and adjacent segment degeneration were analyzed with the RevMan 5.3.3 software.
Results: A total of 15 studies were included. There was no difference regarding preoperative or postoperative Japanese Orthopedic Association score, Neck Disability Index, segmental Cobb angle and intervertebral height, preoperative cervical Cobb angle, fusion rate, incidence of subsidence, and adjacent segment degeneration between the SSC and CP group (P > 0.05). However, the SSC group had shorter operative time (mean difference [MD], -11.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], -16.24 to -3.66) and hospital stay (MD, -0.64; 95% CI, -1.21 to -0.06), less intraoperative blood loss (MD, -13.22; 95% CI, -19.03 to -7.41) and postoperative cervical Cobb angle (MD, -0.70; 95% CI, -1.35 to -0.06), and lower incidence of dysphagia significantly (odds ratio, -0.57; 95% CI, 0.40-0.82) (P < 0.05).
Conclusions: ACDF with SSC and CP in multilevel cervical spondylosis achieved similar clinical relief. Although CP maintained better cervical lordosis, SSC contributed to less surgical pain and fewer complications. ACDF with SSC is safe and efficient in treating multilevel cervical spondylosis.
Keywords: ACDF; Anterior cervical decompression and fusion; Anterior plate; Meta-analysis; Multilevel cervical spondylosis; Self-locking stand-alone cage.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Can Self-Locking Cages Offer the Same Clinical Outcomes as Anterior Cage-with-Plate Fixation for 3-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) in Mid-Term Follow-Up?Med Sci Monit. 2019 Jan 19;25:547-557. doi: 10.12659/MSM.911234. Med Sci Monit. 2019. PMID: 30659165 Free PMC article.
-
A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using self-locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage with ACDF using cage and plate in the treatment of three-level cervical degenerative spondylopathy: a retrospective study with 2-year follow-up.Eur Spine J. 2016 Jul;25(7):2255-62. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4391-x. Epub 2016 Feb 23. Eur Spine J. 2016. PMID: 26906171
-
[Comparison of effectiveness between zero-profile anchored cage and plate-cage construct in treatment of consecutive three-level cervical spondylosis].Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025 Feb 15;39(2):193-200. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202410092. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025. PMID: 39971365 Free PMC article. Chinese.
-
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion in multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Dec;95(49):e5437. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005437. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016. PMID: 27930523 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Self-locking stand-alone cage versus cage-plate fixation in monosegmental anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a minimum 2-year follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jun 2;18(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03885-4. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023. PMID: 37269002 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
The Impact of Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion on Cervical Sagittal Alignment: A Comparative Study of Single-, Two-, and Three-Level Procedures.J Clin Med. 2025 May 13;14(10):3413. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103413. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40429408 Free PMC article.
-
Zero-profile anchored spacer versus conventional plate-cage construct in bilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Aug 31;18(1):644. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04134-4. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023. PMID: 37653510 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical disc degenerative diseases on the basis of more than 60 months of follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Neurol. 2020 Apr 20;20(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-01717-0. BMC Neurol. 2020. PMID: 32312321 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term effectiveness of stand-alone anchored spacer in multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion compared with cage-plate system: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Spine J. 2025 Feb;34(2):694-706. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08613-y. Epub 2024 Dec 19. Eur Spine J. 2025. PMID: 39694916
-
Contiguous Two-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using Zero-P VA System: A Retrospective Study.Orthop Res Rev. 2025 May 16;17:213-220. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S517491. eCollection 2025. Orthop Res Rev. 2025. PMID: 40395935 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous