Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan;33(1):106-111.
doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2018.11.068. Epub 2019 Jan 21.

Intensive care nurses' well-being: A systematic review

Affiliations

Intensive care nurses' well-being: A systematic review

Rebecca J Jarden et al. Aust Crit Care. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Unique work challenges of intensive care nurses can cause both stress and distress to nurses, evident in prevailing literature regarding burnout, compassion fatigue, and moral distress. Identifying factors contributing to intensive care nurses' well-being would complement this focus on nurse ill-being, supporting the development of workplace well-being initiatives. The review seeks to balance the existing negatively skewed evidence base by investigating intensive care nurses' well-being rather than ill-being.

Objectives: The objective of this review was to systematically identify, appraise, and synthesise primary research reporting intensive care nurses' well-being.

Methods: The electronic search strategy included (1) bibliographic databases for published work and (2) forward and backward citation searches. Key search terms included [critical OR intensive] AND [nurs*] AND [well*]. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) population: critical or intensive care nurses working with adult or mixed adult and paediatric patients, (2) study type: primary research studies, (3) outcome: intensive care unit nurses' well-being, and (4) publication available in the English language. Studies were excluded if the group of intensive care nurses was not independently reported. Included studies were critically appraised, and results were synthesised and presented descriptively. Semantics of the included studies were explored to identify frequently used terms.

Results: Four primary research studies met the inclusion criteria, focussing on spiritual well-being, team commitment, emotional well-being, and the effects of a mindfulness programme. The studies were heterogeneous in terms of study focus, definitions, and measures, with small sample sizes, and of variable quality and generalisability.

Conclusions: The well-being of intensive care nurses is currently understudied. Conceptualising intensive care nurses' well-being, understanding correlates of well-being, and testing workplace interventions to improve well-being remain significant opportunities for future research.

Keywords: Critical appraisal; Critical care nurses; Intensive care unit; Systematic review; Well-being.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • A response to the recent well-being systematic review.
    Agarwal R, Bravo EI, Madhivanan P, Taylor-Amador S. Agarwal R, et al. Aust Crit Care. 2019 Sep;32(5):353. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2019.04.001. Aust Crit Care. 2019. PMID: 31446931 No abstract available.
  • Response to letter to the editor.
    Jarden RJ, Sandham M, Siegert RJ, Koziol-McLain J. Jarden RJ, et al. Aust Crit Care. 2019 Sep;32(5):354. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2019.05.004. Aust Crit Care. 2019. PMID: 31446932 No abstract available.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources