Maximising the impact of patient reported outcome assessment for patients and society

Melanie Calvert¹, Derek Kyte², Gary Price², Jose M Valderas³, Niels Henrik Hjollund⁴

Affiliations

¹ Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research (CPROR), Institute of Applied Health Research, and NIHR, Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham B15 2TT UK m.calvert@bham.ac.uk.
² Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research (CPROR), Institute of Applied Health Research, and NIHR, Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham B15 2TT UK.
³ NIHR PenCLAHRC and Institute for Health Services Research, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, St Leonards, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK.
⁴ AmbuFlex/WestChronic, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Herning, Denmark, and Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

PMID: 30679170
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k5267

Maximising the impact of patient reported outcome assessment for patients and society

Melanie Calvert et al. BMJ. 2019.

. 2019 Jan 24:364:k5267.

doi: 10.1136/bmj.k5267.

Authors

Melanie Calvert¹, Derek Kyte², Gary Price², Jose M Valderas³, Niels Henrik Hjollund⁴

Affiliations

¹ Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research (CPROR), Institute of Applied Health Research, and NIHR, Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham B15 2TT UK m.calvert@bham.ac.uk.
² Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research (CPROR), Institute of Applied Health Research, and NIHR, Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham B15 2TT UK.
³ NIHR PenCLAHRC and Institute for Health Services Research, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, St Leonards, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK.
⁴ AmbuFlex/WestChronic, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Herning, Denmark, and Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

PMID: 30679170
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k5267

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: We have read and understood BMJ policy on conflicts of interest and declare the following: MC has received personal fees from Astellas, Takeda, and Glaukos outside the submitted work and grants from the NIHR and is a coinvestigator at Health Data Research UK Midlands. DK is supported by the NIHR postdoctoral fellowship scheme (PDF-2016-09-009). JMV has received grants and fellowships from NIHR and Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Spain), grants from MRC, CRUK, Royal Devon and Exeter Trust, Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (Spain), consultancy fees from the World Health Organization, and Technische Krankenkasse (Germany) and currently is chairman (unpaid) of the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement panel for the development of core sets of outcomes for Health Overall Adult Health. GP and NHH declare no competing interests.

Comment in

Patient reported outcome measurement: drawbacks of existing methods.
Smith S, Cano S, Browne J. Smith S, et al. BMJ. 2019 Feb 27;364:l844. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l844. BMJ. 2019. PMID: 30814095 No abstract available.

Cited by

Priority recommendations for the implementation of patient-reported outcomes in clinical cancer care: a Delphi study.
Mazariego C, Jefford M, Chan RJ, Roberts N, Millar L, Anazodo A, Hayes S, Brown B, Saunders C, Webber K, Vardy J, Girgis A, Koczwara B; COSA PRO Working Group. Mazariego C, et al. J Cancer Surviv. 2022 Feb;16(1):33-43. doi: 10.1007/s11764-021-01135-2. Epub 2022 Feb 2. J Cancer Surviv. 2022. PMID: 35107792 Free PMC article.
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a web-based routine assessment with integrated recommendations for action for depression and anxiety (RehaCAT+): protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial for patients with elevated depressive symptoms in rehabilitation facilities.
Knauer J, Terhorst Y, Philippi P, Kallinger S, Eiler S, Kilian R, Waldmann T, Moshagen M, Bader M, Baumeister H. Knauer J, et al. BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 23;12(6):e061259. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061259. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35738644 Free PMC article.
PROMs data: can it be used to make decisions for individual patients? A narrative review.
Field J, Holmes MM, Newell D. Field J, et al. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2019 Jul 29;10:233-241. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S156291. eCollection 2019. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2019. PMID: 31534379 Free PMC article.
Data entry quality of double data entry vs automated form processing technologies: A cohort study validation of optical mark recognition and intelligent character recognition in a clinical setting.
Paulsen A, Harboe K, Dalen I. Paulsen A, et al. Health Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 29;3(4):e210. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.210. eCollection 2020 Dec. Health Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 33283058 Free PMC article.
Patients' acceptability of a patient-reported outcome measure in cardiac rehabilitation (the PRO-Heart-DK)-a mixed methods study using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability.
Dedic E, Vistisen HS, Zwisler AD, Pedersen BF, Kappel KL, Kanstrup H, Mols RE, Egholm CL. Dedic E, et al. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2025 Mar 25;9(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00831-8. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2025. PMID: 40131675 Free PMC article.

See all "Cited by" articles

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

Grants and funding

PDF-2016-09-009/DH_/Department of Health/United Kingdom

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- HighWire

Save citation to file

Email citation

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search

Create a file for external citation management software

Your RSS Feed

Maximising the impact of patient reported outcome assessment for patients and society

Affiliations

Maximising the impact of patient reported outcome assessment for patients and society

Authors

Affiliations

Conflict of interest statement

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources