Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election
- PMID: 30679368
- DOI: 10.1126/science.aau2706
Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election
Abstract
The spread of fake news on social media became a public concern in the United States after the 2016 presidential election. We examined exposure to and sharing of fake news by registered voters on Twitter and found that engagement with fake news sources was extremely concentrated. Only 1% of individuals accounted for 80% of fake news source exposures, and 0.1% accounted for nearly 80% of fake news sources shared. Individuals most likely to engage with fake news sources were conservative leaning, older, and highly engaged with political news. A cluster of fake news sources shared overlapping audiences on the extreme right, but for people across the political spectrum, most political news exposure still came from mainstream media outlets.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.
Comment in
-
The misinformation machine.Science. 2019 Jan 25;363(6425):348. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw1315. Science. 2019. PMID: 30679361 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election.Nat Commun. 2019 Jan 2;10(1):7. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07761-2. Nat Commun. 2019. PMID: 30602729 Free PMC article.
-
Supersharers of fake news on Twitter.Science. 2024 May 31;384(6699):979-982. doi: 10.1126/science.adl4435. Epub 2024 May 30. Science. 2024. PMID: 38815033
-
Everyday non-partisan fake news: Sharing behavior, platform specificity, and detection.Front Psychol. 2023 May 15;14:1118407. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1118407. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 37255519 Free PMC article.
-
Measuring the news and its impact on democracy.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 13;118(15):e1912443118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1912443118. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021. PMID: 33837145 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A short review on susceptibility to falling for fake political news.Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Dec;36:44-48. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.014. Epub 2020 Apr 10. Curr Opin Psychol. 2020. PMID: 32521507 Review.
Cited by
-
The consequences of online partisan media.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 6;118(14):e2013464118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2013464118. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021. PMID: 33782116 Free PMC article.
-
Ratioing the President: An exploration of public engagement with Obama and Trump on Twitter.PLoS One. 2021 Apr 14;16(4):e0248880. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248880. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33852612 Free PMC article.
-
Framing COVID-19: How we conceptualize and discuss the pandemic on Twitter.PLoS One. 2020 Sep 30;15(9):e0240010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240010. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32997720 Free PMC article.
-
Leveraging Chatbots to Combat Health Misinformation for Older Adults: Participatory Design Study.JMIR Form Res. 2024 Oct 11;8:e60712. doi: 10.2196/60712. JMIR Form Res. 2024. PMID: 39393065 Free PMC article.
-
Social Media News Use and COVID-19 Misinformation Engagement: Survey Study.J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 20;24(9):e38944. doi: 10.2196/38944. J Med Internet Res. 2022. PMID: 36067414 Free PMC article.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources