Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 24;9(1):655.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36827-w.

Optimization of HER3 expression imaging using affibody molecules: Influence of chelator for labeling with indium-111

Affiliations

Optimization of HER3 expression imaging using affibody molecules: Influence of chelator for labeling with indium-111

Sara S Rinne et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Radionuclide molecular imaging of human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3) expression using affibody molecules could be used for patient stratification for HER3-targeted cancer therapeutics. We hypothesized that the properties of HER3-targeting affibody molecules might be improved through modification of the radiometal-chelator complex. Macrocyclic chelators NOTA (1,4,7-triazacyclononane-N,N',N''-triacetic acid), NODAGA (1-(1,3-carboxypropyl)-4,7-carboxymethyl-1,4,7-triazacyclononane), DOTA (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid), and DOTAGA (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododececane,1-(glutaric acid)-4,7,10-triacetic acid) were conjugated to the C-terminus of anti-HER3 affibody molecule Z08698 and conjugates were labeled with indium-111. All conjugates bound specifically and with picomolar affinity to HER3 in vitro. In mice bearing HER3-expressing xenografts, no significant difference in tumor uptake between the conjugates was observed. Presence of the negatively charged 111In-DOTAGA-complex resulted in the lowest hepatic uptake and the highest tumor-to-liver ratio. In conclusion, the choice of chelator influences the biodistribution of indium-111 labeled anti-HER3 affibody molecules. Hepatic uptake of anti-HER3 affibody molecules could be reduced by the increase of negative charge of the radiometal-chelator complex on the C-terminus without significantly influencing the tumor uptake.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

S.S., V.T. and A.O. own stock in Affibody A.B. S.S.R., C.D.L., M.R., T.Z.B., A.K.G., J.L. declare no potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Structural overview of macrocyclic maleimide chelators 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-N,N′,N′′-triacetic acid (NOTA), 1-(1,3-carboxypropyl)-4,7-carboxymethyl-1,4,7-triazacyclononane (NODAGA), 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) and 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododececane,1-(glutaric acid)-4,7,10-triacetic acid (DOTAGA) and charge of the complexes formed with indium-111 when conjugated to Z08698.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Binding specificity of 111In-Z08698-X on BxPC-3 and DU145 cells. HER3 receptors in the blocked group were pre-saturated with excess of unlabeled Z08698. Data are presented as an average ± standard deviation from three cell culture dishes.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cellular processing of 111In-Z08698-X on BxPC-3 (black) and DU145 cells (grey). Total cell bound activity (solid line) and internalized activity (dashed line) are displayed as percent of cell associated activity. The values were normalized to maximum cell-associated activity for each conjugate. Data are presented as an average ± standard deviation from three cell culture dishes.
Figure 4
Figure 4
SPECT-CT imaging of 111In-Z08698-X. MIP images coronal and sagittal view at A) 4 h pi and B) 24 h pi. Mice were bearing BxPC-3 xenografts and injected with 2 µg (~1.5 MBq) 111In-Z08698-X.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Activity uptake in liver (left) and tumor-to-liver ratios for all 111In-Z08698-X conjugates over time studied in female Balb/c nu/nu mice bearing BxPC-3 xenografts. Significant differences between conjugates are marked with asterisks.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Amin DN, Campbell MR, Moasser MM. The role of HER3, the unpretentious member of the HER family, in cancer biology and cancer therapeutics. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2010;21:944–950. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2010.08.007. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang, Z. ErbB Receptors and Cancer. ErbB Receptor Signaling, in Methods In Molecular Biology (ed. Wang, Z.) 3–35 (Humana Press, 2017). - PubMed
    1. Baselga J, Swain SM. Novel anticancer targets: revisiting ERBB2 and discovering ERBB3. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2009;9:463–475. doi: 10.1038/nrc2656. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee Y, et al. Role of erbB3 receptors in cancer therapeutic resistance. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2014;46:190–198. doi: 10.1093/abbs/gmt150. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mota JM, et al. A comprehensive review of heregulins, HER3, and HER4 as potential therapeutic targets in cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8:89284–89306. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18467. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types