Comment on: "Pitfalls in the measurement of muscle mass: a need for a reference standard" by Buckinx et al
- PMID: 30680964
- PMCID: PMC6351671
- DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.12372
Comment on: "Pitfalls in the measurement of muscle mass: a need for a reference standard" by Buckinx et al
Keywords: dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; measurement; methods; muscle; sarcopenia; standard.
Comment in
-
The authors reply: Letter on: "Pitfalls in the measurement of muscle mass: a need for a reference standard" by Clark et al.J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2018 Dec;9(7):1272-1274. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12387. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2018. PMID: 30697981 Free PMC article.
Comment on
-
Pitfalls in the measurement of muscle mass: a need for a reference standard.J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2018 Apr;9(2):269-278. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12268. Epub 2018 Jan 19. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2018. PMID: 29349935 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Claassen JAHR. The gold standard: not a golden standard. BMJ 2005;330:1121.
-
- Mitsiopoulos N, Baumgartner RN, Heymsfield SB, Lyons W, Gallagher D, Ross R. Cadaver validation of skeletal muscle measurement by magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography. J Appl Physiol 1998;85:115–122. - PubMed
-
- Morse CI, Degens H, Jones DA. The validity of estimating quadriceps volume from single MRI cross‐sections in young men. Eur J Appl Physiol 2007;100:267–274. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
