Diagnostic performance of serum pepsinogen assay for the prediction of atrophic gastritis and gastric neoplasms: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 30681610
- PMCID: PMC6358409
- DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014240
Diagnostic performance of serum pepsinogen assay for the prediction of atrophic gastritis and gastric neoplasms: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Serum pepsinogen assay (sPGA) combining concentration of pepsinogen I (PG I), and the ratio of PG I/II is the noninvasive biomarker for predicting chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) and neoplasms reflecting mucosal secretory status. Although various cut-off values have been suggested, PG I ≤70 ng/mL and PG I/II ≤3 have been widely accepted. However, previous studies for diagnostic test accuracy presented only pooled outcomes, which cannot discriminate the diagnostic validity of sPGA with cut-off of PG I ≤70 ng/mL and PG I/II ≤3.
Methods: We will search the core databases [MEDLINE (through PubMed), the Cochrane Library, and Embase] from their inception to December 2018 by 2 independent evaluators. The P.I.C.O. is as follows; Patients: who have histologically proven CAG or gastric neoplasms, Intervention: sPGA with cut-off of PG I ≤70 ng/mL and/or PG I/II ≤3, Comparison: none, Outcome: diagnostic performance indices of sPGA for CAG and gastric neoplasms (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, likelihood ratios) (if, true/false positive, true/false negative values are presented, diagnostic performance indices will be calculated). All types of study design with full text will be sought and included. The risk of bias will be assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Descriptive data synthesis is planned and quantitative synthesis (bivariate and HSROC model) will be used if the included studies are sufficiently homogenous. Publication bias will be assessed.
Results: The results will provide clinical evidence for diagnostic validity of sPGA.
Conclusion: This study will provide evidence of sPGA for predicting CAG and gastric neoplasms.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Similar articles
-
Prediction of Chronic Atrophic Gastritis and Gastric Neoplasms by Serum Pepsinogen Assay: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy.J Clin Med. 2019 May 10;8(5):657. doi: 10.3390/jcm8050657. J Clin Med. 2019. PMID: 31083485 Free PMC article.
-
[Correlation of serum pepsinogen level and gastric mucosal changes of residents in the high incidence area of gastric cancer].Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2006 Jul;28(7):507-11. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2006. PMID: 17147114 Chinese.
-
[Studies on the cut-off value of serum pepsinogen abnormality for screening chronic atrophic gastritis and gastric carcinoma].Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2006 Oct;27(10):840-4. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2006. PMID: 17343174 Chinese.
-
[Pepsinogen I, pepsinogen II, and pepsinogen I/II ratio].Nihon Rinsho. 2005 Aug;63 Suppl 8:741-3. Nihon Rinsho. 2005. PMID: 16149628 Review. Japanese. No abstract available.
-
The diagnostic value of interleukin 6 as a biomarker for gastric cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review.Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Nov 24;100(47):e27945. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027945. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021. PMID: 34964773 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Application of serum pepsinogen and carbohydrate antigen 72-4 (CA72-4) combined with gastrin-17 (G-17) detection in the screening, diagnosis, and evaluation of early gastric cancer.J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021 Jun;12(3):1042-1048. doi: 10.21037/jgo-21-254. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34295555 Free PMC article.
-
Prediction of Chronic Atrophic Gastritis and Gastric Neoplasms by Serum Pepsinogen Assay: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy.J Clin Med. 2019 May 10;8(5):657. doi: 10.3390/jcm8050657. J Clin Med. 2019. PMID: 31083485 Free PMC article.
-
Delta neutrophil index as a predictor of disease severity, surgical outcomes, and mortality rates in gastrointestinal diseases: Rationale for a meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Aug;98(35):e17059. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017059. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019. PMID: 31464966 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Value of Combined Detection of Serum sTim-3 and Pepsinogen for Gastric Cancer Diagnosis.Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Oct 9;13:7759-7769. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S328312. eCollection 2021. Cancer Manag Res. 2021. PMID: 34675671 Free PMC article.
-
Is serum pepsinogen testing necessary in populationbased screening for gastric cancer?Korean J Intern Med. 2020 May;35(3):544-546. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2020.139. Epub 2020 Apr 29. Korean J Intern Med. 2020. PMID: 32392661 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- World Health Organization Fact Sheets on Cancer. Available at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs297/en Accessed August 13, 2018.
-
- Correa P. A human model of gastric carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 1988;48:3554–60. - PubMed
-
- de Vries AC, van Grieken NC, Looman CW, et al. Gastric cancer risk in patients with premalignant gastric lesions: a nationwide cohort study in the Netherlands. Gastroenterology 2008;134:945–52. - PubMed
-
- Jun JK, Choi KS, Lee HY, et al. Effectiveness of the Korean National Cancer Screening program in reducing gastric cancer mortality. Gastroenterology 2017;152:1319.e7–28.e7. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical