Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1988 Dec;26(12):2526-30.
doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.12.2526-2530.1988.

Comparative evaluation of the oxoid signal and Roche Septi-Chek blood culture systems

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparative evaluation of the oxoid signal and Roche Septi-Chek blood culture systems

P R Murray et al. J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Dec.

Abstract

The Oxoid Signal blood culture system (Oxoid USA, Inc., Columbia, Md.) was compared with the Roche Septi-Chek system (Roche Diagnostics, Div. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., Nutley, N.J.), with the latter consisting of a tryptic soy broth (R-TSB) bottle with an attached agar slide unit and a Columbia broth bottle. A total of 5,034 cultures with equal volumes of blood in each bottle were processed. Overall, more organisms were recovered in the R-TSB bottle than in the Signal bottle, with significantly more aerobic organisms (Pseudomonas spp., Acinetobacter spp., and yeasts) recovered in the R-TSB bottles and anaerobes and viridans group streptococci recovered in Signal bottles. Approximately equivalent numbers of organisms were recovered in the Signal and Columbia broth bottles. The times of detection were essentially identical with the three blood culture broth systems. During the study, 30.6% of the Signal bottles had a positive indicator of growth, of which 1,103 (71.7%) were false-positive cultures. Additionally, nonviable organisms resembling streptococci were observed in 13.7% of the Signal bottles that were Gram stained and in unioculated blood culture bottles. With appropriate modifications of the preparation of the media, the latter problem can be eliminated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Radiology. 1969 Jan;92(1):154-5 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Sep;12(3):445-6 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Sep;16(3):525-30 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 May;17(5):864-9 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Feb;23(2):221-5 - PubMed

Publication types