Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Jan 25;14(1):31.
doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1066-4.

Comparing two dry needling interventions for plantar heel pain: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Zaid Al-Boloushi  1   2   3 , Eva María Gómez-Trullén  1 , Pablo Bellosta-López  2 , María Pilar López-Royo  1   2 , Daniel Fernández  2 , Pablo Herrero  4
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparing two dry needling interventions for plantar heel pain: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Zaid Al-Boloushi et al. J Orthop Surg Res. .

Abstract

Background: Both manual therapy techniques and dry needling have shown to be effective treatment options for the treatment of plantar heel pain; however, in recent years, other techniques based on dry needling (DN), such as percutaneous needle electrolysis (PNE), have also emerged. Currently, PNE is being used in clinical practice to manage myofascial trigger points, despite the lack of studies comparing the effects of this technique over dry needling. Therefore, the aim of this randomized controlled study is to compare the effectiveness of DN versus PNE for improving the level of pain experienced by patients suffering from plantar heel pain provoked by myofascial trigger points.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial will be conducted with blinded participants and outcome assessors. A sample of 94 patients with a medical diagnosis of plantar heel pain will be recruited and divided into two treatment groups. Eligible participants will be randomly allocated to either (a) treatment group with DN and a self-stretching home program or (b) treatment group with PNE and a self-stretching home program. Each group will receive one treatment session per week over a period of 4 weeks. The primary outcome measure will be the pain subscale of the Foot Health Status Questionnaire. The secondary outcome measures will be a visual analogue scale for pain (average and highest level of pain experienced during the previous 48 h; level of pain immediately after the treatment session) and health-related quality of life (assessed using the EuroQoL-5 dimensions). Cost-effectiveness data will be extracted based on the EuroQoL-5 dimensions. Follow-up measurements will take place at baseline and at 4, 8, 12, 26, and 52 weeks.

Discussion: The justification for this trial is the need to improve current understanding regarding the effectiveness of treatments targeting the rehabilitation of plantar heel pain. This study will be the first randomized controlled trial to directly compare the effectiveness of DN and PNE combined with a specific stretching program for the treatment of plantar heel pain provoked by myofascial trigger points.

Trial registration: Clinical Trials NCT03236779. Registered at clinicaltrials.gov 2 August 2017.

Keywords: Cost-effectiveness; Dry needling; Myofascial trigger points; Percutaneous needle electrolysis; Plantar heel pain; Self-stretching protocol.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study design, procedures and informed consent procedure were approved by the Ministry of Health in the state of Kuwait. Consent to participate will be obtained from the participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram. Randomized controlled trial design
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schedule for enrolment and intervention
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Landorf KB, Menz HB. Plantar heel pain and fasciitis. BMJ Clin Evid. 2008;2:1111. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Landorf KB. Plantar heel pain and plantar fasciitis. BMJ Clin Evid. 2015;11:1111. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Martin RL, Davenport TE, Reischl SF, McPoil TG, Matheson JW, Wukich DK, et al. Heel pain-plantar fasciitis: clinical practice guidelines linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health from the Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014;44(11):A1–A33. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.0303. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McPoil TG, Martin RL, Cornwall MW, Wukich DK, Irrgang JJ, Godges JJ. Heel pain--plantar fasciitis: clinical practice guidelines linked to the international classification of function, disability, and health from the orthopaedic section of the American Physical Therapy Association. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008;38(4):A1–A18. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.0302. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Riddle DL, Schappert SM. Volume of ambulatory care visits and patterns of care for patients diagnosed with plantar fasciitis: a national study of medical doctors. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25(5):303–310. doi: 10.1177/107110070402500505. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data