Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 25;14(1):16.
doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1216-1.

Early stage non-small cell lung cancer treated with pencil beam scanning particle therapy: retrospective analysis of early results on safety and efficacy

Affiliations

Early stage non-small cell lung cancer treated with pencil beam scanning particle therapy: retrospective analysis of early results on safety and efficacy

Jian Chen et al. Radiat Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of particle therapy (PT) using pencil beam scanning (PBS) technique for early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods: From 08/2014 to 03/2018, 31 consecutive patients with sum of the longest diameters of primary tumor and hilar lymph node < 5 cm, N0-1, M0 NSCLC treated with PT were retrospectively analyzed. Gating/active breathing control techniques were used to control tumor motion in 20 and 7 patients. PBS-based proton radiotherapy (PRT) or carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) plans were designed via Syngo® planning system. PRT, PRT + CIRT boost, and CIRT were used in 6, 6 and 19 patients, respectively. Prescriptions were categorized to 3 levels: 5-7.5 GyE * 8-10 Fx, 4-5 GyE * 15-16 Fx and 2.25-3.5 GyE * 20-31 Fx.

Results: Thirty-one patients (20 males and 11 females) with a median age of 71 (50-80) years were enrolled with a median follow-up time of 12.1 (2.9-45.2) months. Fourteen were adenocarcinomas, 7 squamous cell carcinomas, 4 non-specified NSCLC and 6 had no histological diagnosis (4/6 had previous resected lung cancer). The median tumor size was 3.1 (1.1-4.7) cm. No grade 4-5 toxicities were observed. One patient experienced grade 3 (per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03) radiation-induced lung injury (RILI) at 6.7 months from radiation started. Grade 2 acute toxicities included hematological toxicities (5 cases), RILI (2), plural pain (1) and dermatitis (1). Grade 2 late toxicities included RILI (3) and asymptomatic rib fracture (1). Three patients had progressed disease at 4.0~10.6 months after the initiation of PT. One experienced local failure with simultaneous distant failure and died of brain metastasis at 10.8 months; one developed regional and distant failure and died of lung infection at 8.7 months; the other experienced isolated distant failure only and his disease was well controlled after salvage systemic therapy. The estimated rates of progression-free survival, local control, cause-specific survival and overall survival at 1, 2 years were 85.5% and 85.5%, 95.2% and 95.2%, 95.0% and 95.0%, 90.7% and 90.7%, respectively.

Conclusions: PBS-based PT appears safe and effective for early stage NSCLC. Further follow-up and investigation is warranted.

Trial registration: ISRCTN, ISRCTN78973763. Registered 14 August 2018- Retrospectively registered, http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN78973763 .

Keywords: Carbon ion; Early stage non-small cell lung cancer; Particle therapy; Pencil beam scanning; Proton; Radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board and written informed consents from all patients were obtained.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Typical dose distribution of CIRT (pencial beam scannning) (a) vs. X-ray based radiation therapy (RapidARC®) (b). CIRT significantly reduced the doses to the contralateral lung, heart, spinal cord, and the volume of low-dose area as compared to X-ray based arc therapy
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The estimated curves of local control and various survival rates. Panel a shows that of progression-free survival (PFS), panel b local control (LC), panel c cause-specific survival (CSS), and panel d overall survival (OS)

References

    1. Mirimanoff R-O. Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR): an alternative to surgery in stage I-II non-small-cell cancer of the lung? Chin Clin Oncol. 2015;4(42). 10.3978/j.issn.2304-3865.2015.11.02. - PubMed
    1. Chang JY, Jabbour SK, De Ruysscher D, Schild SE, Simone CB, Rengan R, et al. Consensus statement on proton therapy in early-stage and locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;95:505–516. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.01.036. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Macdonald OK, Kruse JJ, Miller JM, Garces YI, Brown PD, Miller RC, et al. Proton beam radiotherapy versus three-dimensional conformal stereotactic body radiotherapy in primary peripheral, early-stage non-small-cell lung carcinoma: a comparative dosimetric analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;75:950–958. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Register SP, Zhang X, Mohan R, Chang JY. Proton stereotactic body radiation therapy for clinically challenging cases of centrally and superiorly located stage I non-small-cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;80:1015–1022. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.03.012. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chang JY, Li H, Zhu XR, Liao Z, Zhao L, Liu A, et al. Clinical implementation of intensity modulated proton therapy for thoracic malignancies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;90:809–818. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.07.045. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms