US military medical ethics in the War on Terror
- PMID: 30683802
 - PMCID: PMC6678039
 - DOI: 10.1136/jramc-2018-001062
 
US military medical ethics in the War on Terror
Abstract
Military medical ethics has been challenged by the post-11 September 2001 'War on Terror'. Two recurrent questions are whether military physicians are officers first or physicians first, and whether military physicians need a separate code of ethics. In this article, we focus on how the War on Terror has affected the way we have addressed these questions since 2001. Two examples frame this discussion: the use of military physicians to force-feed hunger strikers held in Guantanamo Bay prison camp, and the uncertain fate of the Department of Defense's report on 'Ethical Guidelines and Practices for US Military Medical Professionals'.
Keywords: ethics; health; medical.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
References
- 
    
- Jim Mattis letter of August 17. 2017. Available: https://dod.defense.gov/./1/./Ethical-Standards-for-All-Hands-SecDef-04-...
 
 - 
    
- Hayden M. Playing the edge: American Intelligence in the Age of Terror 2016.
 
 - 
    
- Eisenhower PDD. Executive order 10631, Auf. 17 1955.
 
 - 
    
- Annas GJ. Protecting soldiers from friendly fire: the consent requirement for using investigational drugs and vaccines in combat. Am J Law Med 1998;24:245–60. - PubMed
 
 - 
    
- Ethics MM. Military medical ethics (Beam TE, Sparacino LR, eds) 2 vol., USUHS, Bethesda,MD, 2003. N Engl J Med 2005;352:312–4.
 
 
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical