A participatory epidemiological study of major cattle diseases amongst Maasai pastoralists living in wildlife-livestock interfaces in Maasai Mara, Kenya
- PMID: 30684224
- PMCID: PMC6520318
- DOI: 10.1007/s11250-018-01790-1
A participatory epidemiological study of major cattle diseases amongst Maasai pastoralists living in wildlife-livestock interfaces in Maasai Mara, Kenya
Abstract
Livestock-wildlife interactions promote the transmission of a wide range of infectious diseases that constraint livestock production. We used a participatory appraisal approach to find out and rank infectious diseases of concern to pastoralists in a zone of intense wildlife-livestock interaction and another zone with limited interactions. Four villages were selected purposively in areas with intensive cattle-wildlife interactions (zone 1), and another two in areas with low to moderate cattle-wildlife interactions (zone 2). Data were collected in focus group discussions (FGDs) using participatory epidemiological methods (PE); each group had 8-13 participants. Results of impact matrix scoring from all sites indicated that malignant catarrhal fever (MCF), anthrax, foot and mouth disease (FMD), contagious bovine pleuropneumonia (CBPP), east coast fever (ECF) and African animal trypanosomiasis (ATT), in decreasing order, had the highest impact on livestock production. A Kruskal-Wallis test revealed a significant difference in FMD annual prevalence between cattle age groups (p < 0.001) and was the highest in animals > 4 years (median score of 32.5, range, 10-50). FMD had the highest impact on milk production, but based on veterinary costs (treatment costs), it was ranked second to CBPP. The study provides information on disease priorities that occur in the target zones in Mara ecosystem and which the local pastoralists must consider when accessing key ecosystem services such as water and pasture.
Keywords: Cattle diseases; Livelihoods; Maasai pastoralists; Participatory techniques.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethical approval
Ethical approval for this study was obtained from ILRI Institutional Research Ethics Committee (IREC), reference number ILRI IREC 2016-02. Additional written informed consent for participation and voice recording were obtained from all participants before discussions began.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Abdilatif, M.H., Onono, J.O. and Mutua, F.K., 2018. Analysis of pastoralists’ perception on challenges and opportunities for sheep and goat production in Northern Kenya, Tropical Animal Health and Production, 1–10. - PubMed
-
- Bellet C, Vergne T, Grosbois V, Holl D, Roger F, Goutard F. Evaluating the efficiency of participatory epidemiology to estimate the incidence and impacts of foot-and-mouth disease among livestock owners in Cambodia. Acta Tropica. 2012;123:31–38. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2012.03.010. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
