Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec 12;2(2):e11977.
doi: 10.2196/11977.

Acceptance of Mobile Health Apps for Disease Management Among People With Multiple Sclerosis: Web-Based Survey Study

Affiliations

Acceptance of Mobile Health Apps for Disease Management Among People With Multiple Sclerosis: Web-Based Survey Study

Jennifer Apolinário-Hagen et al. JMIR Form Res. .

Abstract

Background: Mobile health (mHealth) apps might have the potential to promote self-management of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) in everyday life. However, the uptake of MS apps remains poor, and little is known about the facilitators and barriers for their efficient utilization, such as technology acceptance.

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the acceptance of mHealth apps for disease management in the sense of behavioral intentions to use and explore determinants of utilization among people with MS based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT).

Methods: Participants for this Web-based cross-sectional study were recruited throughout Germany with the support of regional MS associations and self-help groups. To identify determinants of intention to use MS apps, a measure based on the UTAUT was adapted with 4 key determinants (performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions) and extended by Intolerance of Uncertainty (IU) and electronic health literacy. Potential influencing effects of both MS and computer self-efficacy (C-SE) as mediators and fatigue as a moderator were analyzed using Hayes's PROCESS macro (SPSS version 3.0) for IBM SPSS version 24.0.

Results: A total of 98 participants (mean age 47.03 years, SD 10.17; 66/98, 67% female) with moderate fatigue levels completed the survey. Although most participants (91/98, 92%) were daily smartphone users, almost two-thirds (62/98, 63%) reported no experience with MS apps. Overall, the acceptance was moderate on average (mean 3.11, SD 1.31, minimum=1 and maximum=5), with lower scores among persons with no experience (P=.04) and higher scores among current users (P<.001). In multiple regression analysis (R2=63% variance explained), performance expectancy (beta=.41) and social influence (beta=.33) were identified as significant predictors of acceptance (all P<.001). C-SE was confirmed as a partial mediator in the relationship between IU and acceptance (indirect effect: B=-.095, 95% CI -0.227 to -0.01). Furthermore, a moderated mediation by C-SE was shown in the relationship between IU and behavioral intentions to use MS apps for low (95% CI -0.42 to -0.01) and moderate levels (95% CI -0.27 to -0.01) of fatigue.

Conclusions: Overall, this exploratory pilot study indicates for the first time that positive expectations about the helpfulness for self-management purposes and social support might be important factors to be considered for improving the acceptance of MS apps among smartphone users with MS. However, given some inconsistent findings, especially regarding the role of effort expectancy and IU and self-efficacy, the conceptual model needs replication with a larger sample of people with MS, varying more in fatigue levels, and a longitudinal assessment of the actual usage of MS apps predicted by acceptance in the sense of behavioral intentions to use.

Keywords: eHealth; mHealth, acceptability of health care; multiple sclerosis; patient preference.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Conceptual study model: adapted and extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology for the acceptance of multiple sclerosis apps. UTAUT: Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology; MS: multiple sclerosis; eHealth: electronic health.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Frequency of general and multiple sclerosis–related smartphone use, proportions in percent (N=98). MS: multiple sclerosis.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Exploratory model for the assessment of the moderation hypotheses for fatigue. Criterion: behavioral intentions to use multiple sclerosis apps. The numbering of the predictors corresponds to the numbering of the 6 reported models. eHealth: electronic health.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zurawski J, Stankiewicz J. Multiple sclerosis re-examined: essential and emerging clinical concepts. Am J Med. 2018 May;131(5):464–72. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.11.044.S0002-9343(17)31280-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Browne P, Chandraratna D, Angood C, Tremlett H, Baker C, Taylor BV, Thompson AJ. Atlas of multiple sclerosis 2013: a growing global problem with widespread inequity. Neurology. 2014 Sep 09;83(11):1022–4. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000768. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/25200713 WNL.0000000000000768 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kingwell E, Marriott JJ, Jetté N, Pringsheim T, Makhani N, Morrow SA, Fisk JD, Evans C, Béland SG, Kulaga S, Dykeman J, Wolfson C, Koch MW, Marrie RA. Incidence and prevalence of multiple sclerosis in Europe: a systematic review. BMC Neurol. 2013 Sep 26;13:128. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-13-128. https://bmcneurol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2377-13-128 1471-2377-13-128 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Petersen G, Wittmann R, Arndt V, Göpffarth D. Epidemiology of multiple sclerosis in Germany: regional differences and drug prescription in the claims data of the statutory health insurance. Nervenarzt. 2014 Aug;85(8):990–8. doi: 10.1007/s00115-014-4097-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Huang WJ, Chen WW, Zhang X. Multiple sclerosis: pathology, diagnosis and treatments. Exp Ther Med. 2017 Jun;13(6):3163–3166. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.4410. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/28588671 ETM-0-0-4410 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources