Acceptance of Mobile Health Apps for Disease Management Among People With Multiple Sclerosis: Web-Based Survey Study
- PMID: 30684408
- PMCID: PMC6334710
- DOI: 10.2196/11977
Acceptance of Mobile Health Apps for Disease Management Among People With Multiple Sclerosis: Web-Based Survey Study
Abstract
Background: Mobile health (mHealth) apps might have the potential to promote self-management of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) in everyday life. However, the uptake of MS apps remains poor, and little is known about the facilitators and barriers for their efficient utilization, such as technology acceptance.
Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the acceptance of mHealth apps for disease management in the sense of behavioral intentions to use and explore determinants of utilization among people with MS based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT).
Methods: Participants for this Web-based cross-sectional study were recruited throughout Germany with the support of regional MS associations and self-help groups. To identify determinants of intention to use MS apps, a measure based on the UTAUT was adapted with 4 key determinants (performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions) and extended by Intolerance of Uncertainty (IU) and electronic health literacy. Potential influencing effects of both MS and computer self-efficacy (C-SE) as mediators and fatigue as a moderator were analyzed using Hayes's PROCESS macro (SPSS version 3.0) for IBM SPSS version 24.0.
Results: A total of 98 participants (mean age 47.03 years, SD 10.17; 66/98, 67% female) with moderate fatigue levels completed the survey. Although most participants (91/98, 92%) were daily smartphone users, almost two-thirds (62/98, 63%) reported no experience with MS apps. Overall, the acceptance was moderate on average (mean 3.11, SD 1.31, minimum=1 and maximum=5), with lower scores among persons with no experience (P=.04) and higher scores among current users (P<.001). In multiple regression analysis (R2=63% variance explained), performance expectancy (beta=.41) and social influence (beta=.33) were identified as significant predictors of acceptance (all P<.001). C-SE was confirmed as a partial mediator in the relationship between IU and acceptance (indirect effect: B=-.095, 95% CI -0.227 to -0.01). Furthermore, a moderated mediation by C-SE was shown in the relationship between IU and behavioral intentions to use MS apps for low (95% CI -0.42 to -0.01) and moderate levels (95% CI -0.27 to -0.01) of fatigue.
Conclusions: Overall, this exploratory pilot study indicates for the first time that positive expectations about the helpfulness for self-management purposes and social support might be important factors to be considered for improving the acceptance of MS apps among smartphone users with MS. However, given some inconsistent findings, especially regarding the role of effort expectancy and IU and self-efficacy, the conceptual model needs replication with a larger sample of people with MS, varying more in fatigue levels, and a longitudinal assessment of the actual usage of MS apps predicted by acceptance in the sense of behavioral intentions to use.
Keywords: eHealth; mHealth, acceptability of health care; multiple sclerosis; patient preference.
©Jennifer Apolinário-Hagen, Mireille Menzel, Severin Hennemann, Christel Salewski. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (http://formative.jmir.org), 12.12.2018.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Comparing the Acceptance of Mobile Hypertension Apps for Disease Management Among Patients Versus Clinical Use Among Physicians: Cross-sectional Survey.JMIR Cardio. 2022 Jan 6;6(1):e31617. doi: 10.2196/31617. JMIR Cardio. 2022. PMID: 34989683 Free PMC article.
-
Acceptance of mHealth Apps for Self-Management Among People with Hypertension.Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Sep 3;267:282-288. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190839. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019. PMID: 31483283
-
Determinants of Fitness App Usage and Moderating Impacts of Education-, Motivation-, and Gamification-Related App Features on Physical Activity Intentions: Cross-sectional Survey Study.J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 13;23(7):e26063. doi: 10.2196/26063. J Med Internet Res. 2021. PMID: 34255656 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Self-Management Support Functions in Apps for People With Persistent Pain: Systematic Review.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Feb 12;7(2):e13080. doi: 10.2196/13080. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019. PMID: 30747715 Free PMC article.
-
Can Acceptance, Mindfulness, and Self-Compassion Be Learned by Smartphone Apps? A Systematic and Meta-Analytic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.Behav Ther. 2020 Jul;51(4):646-658. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2019.10.002. Epub 2019 Nov 26. Behav Ther. 2020. PMID: 32586436 Review.
Cited by
-
Differential influences of social support on app use for diabetes self-management - a mixed methods approach.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jul 7;20(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01173-3. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020. PMID: 32635919 Free PMC article.
-
A Smartphone-based Application for Self-Management in Multiple Sclerosis.J Healthc Eng. 2021 Jun 16;2021:6749951. doi: 10.1155/2021/6749951. eCollection 2021. J Healthc Eng. 2021. PMID: 34221301 Free PMC article.
-
Suitability of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 Model for Predicting mHealth Acceptance Using Diabetes as an Example: Qualitative Methods Triangulation Study.JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Mar 9;9(1):e34918. doi: 10.2196/34918. JMIR Hum Factors. 2022. PMID: 35262493 Free PMC article.
-
Portuguese Validation of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Scale (UTAUT) to a COVID-19 Mobile Application: A Pilot Study.Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 3;11(13):1916. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11131916. Healthcare (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37444750 Free PMC article.
-
Extension of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 model for predicting mHealth acceptance using diabetes as an example: a cross-sectional validation study.BMJ Health Care Inform. 2022 Nov;29(1):e100640. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100640. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2022. PMID: 36379608 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Browne P, Chandraratna D, Angood C, Tremlett H, Baker C, Taylor BV, Thompson AJ. Atlas of multiple sclerosis 2013: a growing global problem with widespread inequity. Neurology. 2014 Sep 09;83(11):1022–4. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000768. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/25200713 WNL.0000000000000768 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Kingwell E, Marriott JJ, Jetté N, Pringsheim T, Makhani N, Morrow SA, Fisk JD, Evans C, Béland SG, Kulaga S, Dykeman J, Wolfson C, Koch MW, Marrie RA. Incidence and prevalence of multiple sclerosis in Europe: a systematic review. BMC Neurol. 2013 Sep 26;13:128. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-13-128. https://bmcneurol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2377-13-128 1471-2377-13-128 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Huang WJ, Chen WW, Zhang X. Multiple sclerosis: pathology, diagnosis and treatments. Exp Ther Med. 2017 Jun;13(6):3163–3166. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.4410. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/28588671 ETM-0-0-4410 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources